Tracking description
Remove with lib from meta sections is a common nitpick that comes into reviews. with is a useful feature but it's overuse can often some silent eval issues that otherwise would be mostly caught with static analysis.
While experimenting with removing it treewide retroactively, I created #371665 which is too big to merged in one go so this issue was created to track the dismembering of that big PR into smaller human reviewable PRs.
The whole effort can be separated in the following stages:
Reference Issue(s)/PR(s)
Follow-up issues/notes
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
Add a 👍 reaction to issues you find important.
Tracking description
Remove with lib from meta sections is a common nitpick that comes into reviews.
withis a useful feature but it's overuse can often some silent eval issues that otherwise would be mostly caught with static analysis.While experimenting with removing it treewide retroactively, I created #371665 which is too big to merged in one go so this issue was created to track the dismembering of that big PR into smaller human reviewable PRs.
The whole effort can be separated in the following stages:
withexpressions; ratchet them down nixpkgs-vet#142Reference Issue(s)/PR(s)
Follow-up issues/notes
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
Add a 👍 reaction to issues you find important.