Describe the bug
In 0b8799e I was faced with the following error when trying to build elisa:
$ nix run -f . elisa
error: Package ‘breeze-qt5-5.18.5’ in /opt/exp/nixpkgs/pkgs/desktops/plasma-5/default.nix:96 is marked as broken, refusing to evaluate.
However, nothing in pkgs/desktops/plasma-5/breeze-qt5.nix suggests that breeze-qt5 is marked as broken. I looked in the "obvious" places, (e.g. all-packages.nix, pkgs/desktops/plasma-5/default.nix) yet have been utterly unable to locate the broken declaration in question. Presumably there is something somewhere which does mark it as broken. However, I haven't the slightest idea how one would find it.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Try building a broken derivation
- Encounter error
- Try in vain to find the
broken attribute
Expected behavior
The error should tell you the source location of the broken attribute.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
Notify maintainers
Metadata
- system: `"x86_64-linux"`
- host os: `Linux 5.8.14, NixOS, 20.09beta1057.0b8799ecaaf (Nightingale)`
- multi-user?: `yes`
- sandbox: `yes`
- version: `nix-env (Nix) 2.3.7`
- channels(root): `"nixos-20.09beta1057.0b8799ecaaf, nixpkgs-20.09beta1057.0b8799ecaaf"`
- channels(ben): `"nixpkgs-20.09beta1083.51aaa3fa1b6, nixpkgs-20_03-20.03.3122.ff6fda61600, nixpkgs-unstable-21.03pre246624.cfed29bfcb2, nixos-18.09-18.09.2574.a7e559a5504"`
- nixpkgs: `/home/ben/.nix-defexpr/channels/nixpkgs`
Maintainer information:
# a list of nixpkgs attributes affected by the problem
attribute:
# a list of nixos modules affected by the problem
module:
Describe the bug
In 0b8799e I was faced with the following error when trying to build
elisa:However, nothing in
pkgs/desktops/plasma-5/breeze-qt5.nixsuggests thatbreeze-qt5is marked as broken. I looked in the "obvious" places, (e.g.all-packages.nix,pkgs/desktops/plasma-5/default.nix) yet have been utterly unable to locate thebrokendeclaration in question. Presumably there is something somewhere which does mark it as broken. However, I haven't the slightest idea how one would find it.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
brokenattributeExpected behavior
The error should tell you the source location of the
brokenattribute.Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
Notify maintainers
Metadata
Maintainer information: