EIP-7778 gas fix#11794
Conversation
|
Claude finished @svlachakis's task in 3m 6s —— View job Code Review — eip7778-gas-fix
SummaryThe fix is correct and clean. The root cause was that transaction admission under EIP-7778 used The fix removes the now-unnecessary Gas accounting path
Test analysisThe renamed test
One structural point worth noting: when FindingsNo Critical, High, or Medium issues. One low-level observation: Low — The inline comment added at the admission site ( Verdict: approved — no blocking issues. The fix is minimal, correct, removes dead code, and is backed by a tight regression test. |
|
Claude finished @svlachakis's task in 2m 27s —— View job Code Review — eip7778-gas-fix
SummaryThe fix is correct and clean. The root cause was that transaction admission under EIP-7778 used The fix removes the now-unnecessary Gas accounting path
Test analysis
One structural subtlety: Moving FindingsNo Critical, High, or Medium issues. Low — The inline comment at Verdict: approved — no blocking issues. The fix is minimal, correct, removes dead code, and is backed by a tight regression test. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Need to also raise as test gap for EEST test so consensus is enforced on the change https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/issues
That not failing with the behaviour change confirms a problem
Test is here ethereum/execution-specs#2932 |
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce?
Testing
Requires testing
If yes, did you write tests?
Notes on testing
Added regression test.