Skip to content

chore: remove vd spec artifact#3602

Merged
cv merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/remove-vd-spec-artifacts
May 15, 2026
Merged

chore: remove vd spec artifact#3602
cv merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/remove-vd-spec-artifacts

Conversation

@jyaunches

@jyaunches jyaunches commented May 15, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Removes leftover /vd_spec workflow artifact committed by PR #3595.\n\nChecked recent open and merged PRs for root spec artifacts (ACCEPTANCE.md and related vd_spec-style files); only ACCEPTANCE.md was present on main.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Removed outdated acceptance criteria documentation to streamline and maintain documentation clarity for users.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 8857cfc6-adf9-40e3-965c-d11bedc27440

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da1ad74 and 355bb1a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ACCEPTANCE.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • ACCEPTANCE.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request removes 16 lines of documentation from ACCEPTANCE.md describing the E2E regression guard coverage job. No new content is added; the change is a pure deletion of that section from the file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Cleanup
ACCEPTANCE.md		 Removes 16 lines describing the E2E regression guard coverage job configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops past outdated words,
Cleaning up old docs undone,
E2E guards fade to memory birds,
Simpler paths for everyone! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title clearly and accurately describes the main change: removing a vd_spec artifact (ACCEPTANCE.md).
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/remove-vd-spec-artifacts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

E2E Advisor Recommendation

Required E2E: None
Optional E2E: None

Workflow run

Full advisor summary

E2E Recommendation Advisor

Base: origin/main
Head: HEAD
Confidence: high

Required E2E

  • None. No E2E is needed because this PR only deletes ACCEPTANCE.md, a documentation/status note about an E2E regression guard. It does not modify any runtime code, CI workflow, E2E test, sandbox, installer/onboarding, credential, network policy, deployment, inference, or assistant user-flow behavior.

Optional E2E

  • None.

New E2E recommendations

  • None.

@cv cv merged commit 7dfe0af into main May 15, 2026
28 checks passed
@wscurran wscurran added the chore Build, CI, dependency, or tooling maintenance label Jun 8, 2026
@jyaunches jyaunches deleted the chore/remove-vd-spec-artifacts branch June 12, 2026 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@cv cv cv approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

chore Build, CI, dependency, or tooling maintenance

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jyaunches @cv @wscurran