test/image-cleanup.test.ts (1)

147-156: ⚡ Quick win

Also assert non-target shields-timer-* file is preserved.

The isolation test currently verifies only shields-<other>.json. Adding shields-timer-<other>.json in the same case would fully cover both prefixes.

Suggested test extension

   it("does not remove state files for other sandboxes", () => {
     const tmpDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "nemoclaw-shields-cleanup-"));
     try {
       const otherFile = path.join(tmpDir, "shields-bravo.json");
+      const otherTimerFile = path.join(tmpDir, "shields-timer-bravo.json");
       fs.writeFileSync(otherFile, JSON.stringify({ shieldsDown: false }));
+      fs.writeFileSync(otherTimerFile, JSON.stringify({ pid: 67890 }));

       removeShieldsState("alpha", tmpDir);

       expect(fs.existsSync(otherFile)).toBe(true);
+      expect(fs.existsSync(otherTimerFile)).toBe(true);
     } finally {
       fs.rmSync(tmpDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
     }
   });

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@test/image-cleanup.test.ts` around lines 147 - 156, Extend the "does not
remove state files for other sandboxes" test to also create a non-target timer
file (e.g., create shields-timer-bravo.json alongside shields-bravo.json), write
some JSON into it, call removeShieldsState("alpha", tmpDir) as before, and add
an assertion that the shields-timer-bravo.json file still exists
(expect(fs.existsSync(timerFile)).toBe(true)); reference the existing test
description and the removeShieldsState function when adding the additional file
creation and expectation.

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

test/image-cleanup.test.ts (1)

147-156: ⚡ Quick win

Also assert shields-timer isolation for other sandboxes.

The “other sandbox” case currently checks only shields-bravo.json; adding shields-timer-bravo.json would fully cover both prefixes handled by removeShieldsState.

Suggested patch

   it("does not remove state files for other sandboxes", () => {
     const tmpDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "nemoclaw-shields-cleanup-"));
     try {
       const otherFile = path.join(tmpDir, "shields-bravo.json");
+      const otherTimerFile = path.join(tmpDir, "shields-timer-bravo.json");
       fs.writeFileSync(otherFile, JSON.stringify({ shieldsDown: false }));
+      fs.writeFileSync(otherTimerFile, JSON.stringify({ pid: 67890 }));

       removeShieldsState("alpha", tmpDir);

       expect(fs.existsSync(otherFile)).toBe(true);
+      expect(fs.existsSync(otherTimerFile)).toBe(true);
     } finally {
       fs.rmSync(tmpDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
     }
   });

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@test/image-cleanup.test.ts` around lines 147 - 156, The test that verifies
removal isolation only asserts the presence of "shields-bravo.json"; update the
"does not remove state files for other sandboxes" test to also create and assert
the presence of the corresponding timer file (e.g., "shields-timer-bravo.json")
so both prefixes handled by removeShieldsState are covered: create
shields-timer-bravo.json in the tmpDir before calling
removeShieldsState("alpha", tmpDir) and add an expectation that fs.existsSync
for that timer file remains true after the call. Ensure you reference the same
tmpDir and use the same cleanup/finally pattern as the existing
shields-bravo.json assertion.

test/image-cleanup.test.ts (1)

119-160: 💤 Low value

Tests cover the three critical cases cleanly.

Happy path, ENOENT no-op, and per-sandbox isolation are all verified with proper finally cleanup. The existing three tests are sufficient for the core contract.

One optional gap: the console.warn branch in removeShieldsState (triggered when rmSync throws a non-ENOENT error such as EPERM) is not exercised. If you want to lock that path in, a fourth test could spy on console.warn and mock fs.rmSync to throw { code: "EPERM" }.

🧪 Optional fourth test to cover the console.warn branch

+  it("warns via console.warn when rmSync throws a non-ENOENT error", () => {
+    const tmpDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "nemoclaw-shields-cleanup-"));
+    try {
+      const warnSpy = vi.spyOn(console, "warn").mockImplementation(() => {});
+      const epermError = Object.assign(new Error("operation not permitted"), { code: "EPERM" });
+      vi.spyOn(fs, "rmSync").mockImplementation(() => { throw epermError; });
+      try {
+        removeShieldsState("alpha", tmpDir);
+        expect(warnSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); // once per prefix
+        expect(warnSpy.mock.calls[0][0]).toMatch(/Failed to remove shields state/);
+      } finally {
+        vi.restoreAllMocks();
+      }
+    } finally {
+      fs.rmSync(tmpDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
+    }
+  });

You'll also need to add vi to the vitest import at line 7:

-import { describe, it, expect } from "vitest";
+import { describe, it, expect, vi } from "vitest";

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@test/image-cleanup.test.ts` around lines 119 - 160, Add a fourth test in
test/image-cleanup.test.ts that exercises the non-ENOENT error branch of
removeShieldsState by spying on console.warn and mocking fs.rmSync to throw an
error object with code "EPERM"; import vi from vitest (add vi to the existing
vitest import) and use vi.spyOn(console, "warn") to assert it was called after
calling removeShieldsState("alpha", tmpDir) while ensuring you restore the spy
and fs.rmSync mock in finally so the test cleans up.

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

src/lib/actions/sandbox/destroy.ts (1)

126-141: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Path traversal in removeShieldsState is still unresolved.

path.join(stateDir, ${prefix}${sandboxName}.json) normalises .. segments: a crafted sandboxName such as ../../../../etc/cron.d/job resolves to paths well outside the intended state directory. Since removeShieldsState is exported, any caller can trigger deletion of arbitrary files on the host filesystem.

The proposed guard from the previous review has not been applied.

🔒 Proposed fix

 export function removeShieldsState(
   sandboxName: string,
   stateDir = path.join(process.env.HOME ?? "/tmp", ".nemoclaw", "state"),
 ): void {
+  const resolvedStateDir = path.resolve(stateDir);
   for (const prefix of ["shields-", "shields-timer-"]) {
-    const filePath = path.join(stateDir, `${prefix}${sandboxName}.json`);
+    const filePath = path.resolve(resolvedStateDir, `${prefix}${sandboxName}.json`);
+    if (!filePath.startsWith(`${resolvedStateDir}${path.sep}`)) {
+      throw new Error(`Invalid sandbox name for shields state cleanup: '${sandboxName}'`);
+    }
     try {
       fs.rmSync(filePath, { force: true });
     } catch (error) {

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@src/lib/actions/sandbox/destroy.ts` around lines 126 - 141, The
removeShieldsState function currently constructs filePath with
path.join(stateDir, `${prefix}${sandboxName}.json`) which allows path traversal;
fix by validating/sanitising sandboxName and verifying the resolved filePath is
inside stateDir before calling fs.rmSync: (1) reject or sanitize sandboxName to
disallow path separators or `..` (e.g. allow only a safe pattern like
alphanumerics, dash, underscore and dot) or use path.basename(sandboxName) to
strip directories; (2) compute const resolved = path.resolve(stateDir,
`${prefix}${sandboxName}.json`) and ensure path.relative(path.resolve(stateDir),
resolved) does not start with '..' (or that
resolved.startsWith(path.resolve(stateDir) + path.sep)); if the check fails,
log/warn and skip deletion; apply these checks around the existing
filePath/resolved variables in removeShieldsState and only call fs.rmSync when
safe.

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

test/image-cleanup.test.ts (1)

166-176: ⚡ Quick win

Use a unique escaped filename to reduce cross-test flake risk.

path.join(tmpDir, "..", "shields-traversal.json") targets a shared path under the temp root; parallel workers can interfere with each other.

♻️ Proposed fix

-    const escapedFile = path.join(tmpDir, "..", "shields-traversal.json");
+    const escapedFile = path.join(
+      tmpDir,
+      "..",
+      `shields-traversal-${process.pid}-${Date.now()}.json`,
+    );

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@test/image-cleanup.test.ts` around lines 166 - 176, The test creates an
escapedFile at path.join(tmpDir, "..", "shields-traversal.json") which can
collide between parallel tests; change the filename to include a unique suffix
(e.g., process.pid, Date.now(), or a random hex) so the variable escapedFile in
the test uses a unique path. Update the test that calls
removeShieldsState("../../shields-traversal", tmpDir) to write/read that unique
escapedFile instead, and ensure cleanup still removes that unique file in the
finally block.