Skip to content

Address issue #539 - inverter loss in buy all/ sell all moved to highest tier that has not reached upper bound#673

Merged
sjanzou merged 3 commits into
developfrom
ssc_539
Nov 29, 2021
Merged

Address issue #539 - inverter loss in buy all/ sell all moved to highest tier that has not reached upper bound#673
sjanzou merged 3 commits into
developfrom
ssc_539

Conversation

@sjanzou

@sjanzou sjanzou commented Nov 28, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

…est tier that has not reached upper bound

@cpaulgilman cpaulgilman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I confirm that the difference between w system usage and w/o system usage is assigned to the highest tier, and that the energy charge reflects that difference.

@sjanzou

sjanzou commented Nov 29, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

The one failing test runs fine on Windows
image

Retesting on Travis running single test ::testing::GTEST_FLAG(filter) = "CMPvsamv1BatteryIntegration_cmod_pvsamv1.ResidentialDCBatteryModelPriceSignalDispatch";
image

batt_DOD_cycle_average output difference - separate issue
27.29 on Windows
27.52 on Travis

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Buy all / sell all incorrectly assigns tier to inverter night time losses

3 participants