Skip to content

Conversation

@yujiex
Copy link
Collaborator

@yujiex yujiex commented Feb 28, 2025

Pull request overview

Description of the purpose of this PR

Pull Request Author

  • Title of PR should be user-synopsis style (clearly understandable in a standalone changelog context)
  • Label the PR with at least one of: Defect, Refactoring, NewFeature, Performance, and/or DoNoPublish
  • Pull requests that impact EnergyPlus code must also include unit tests to cover enhancement or defect repair
  • Author should provide a "walkthrough" of relevant code changes using a GitHub code review comment process
  • If any diffs are expected, author must demonstrate they are justified using plots and descriptions
  • If changes fix a defect, the fix should be demonstrated in plots and descriptions
  • If any defect files are updated to a more recent version, upload new versions here or on DevSupport
  • If IDD requires transition, transition source, rules, ExpandObjects, and IDFs must be updated, and add IDDChange label
  • If structural output changes, add to output rules file and add OutputChange label
  • If adding/removing any LaTeX docs or figures, update that document's CMakeLists file dependencies

Reviewer

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • If branch is behind develop, merge develop and build locally to check for side effects of the merge
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified
  • Check that performance is not impacted (CI Linux results include performance check)
  • Run Unit Test(s) locally
  • Check any new function arguments for performance impacts
  • Verify IDF naming conventions and styles, memos and notes and defaults
  • If new idf included, locally check the err file and other outputs

@yujiex yujiex added the Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus label Feb 28, 2025
@yujiex yujiex requested a review from mjwitte February 28, 2025 02:13
@yujiex yujiex self-assigned this Feb 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mjwitte mjwitte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested with the defect file. Now there's a severe error:

   ** Severe  ** Coil:Cooling:DX:CurveFit:Performance = HEAT PUMP ACDXCOIL 1 PERFORMANCE:  Crankcase Heater Capacity Function of Temperature Curve Name not found = XYZ
   **  Fatal  ** CoilCoolingDXCurveFitOperatingMode::instantiateFromInputSpecErrors found in getting Coil:Cooling:DX:CurveFit:Performance input. Preceding condition(s) causes termination.

CI is all green. Merging. Thanks @yujiex

@mjwitte mjwitte merged commit 9814fa5 into develop Mar 3, 2025
10 checks passed
@mjwitte mjwitte deleted the fixCrankcaseHeaterCurveNameErr branch March 3, 2025 21:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Invalid Crankcase Heater Capacity Function of Outdoor Temperature Curve Name will crash

5 participants