Skip to content

Conversation

@snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor

@snakefoot snakefoot commented Jun 27, 2025

Reduce noise in InternalLogger output

@snakefoot snakefoot added the enhancement Improvement on existing feature label Jun 27, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The RegisterConditionTypes method in the AssemblyExtensionTypes class was updated to register type properties for all condition expression types derived from NLog.Conditions.ConditionExpression. This registration occurs before the existing condition method registrations. No changes were made to public interfaces or method signatures.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/NLog/Config/AssemblyExtensionTypes.cs,
src/NLog/Config/AssemblyExtensionTypes.tt
Added logic to register type properties for all condition expression types with the factory before method registrations. No changes to public interfaces.

Poem

In the meadow of code, new types now bloom,
Condition expressions gather, dispelling the gloom.
The factory hops, registering each with care,
Before old methods join the affair.
With every new property, the system grows bright—
A rabbit’s delight in the soft morning light! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e843833 and 40007f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/NLog/Config/AssemblyExtensionTypes.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/NLog/Config/AssemblyExtensionTypes.tt (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/NLog/Config/AssemblyExtensionTypes.tt (1)

238-249: LGTM! Excellent compile-time optimization.

The T4 template change effectively moves condition expression type registration from runtime reflection to compile-time generation. The logic correctly identifies all types deriving from ConditionExpression and generates appropriate RegisterTypeProperties calls, which should improve startup performance.

src/NLog/Config/AssemblyExtensionTypes.cs (1)

377-388: Generated code looks correct and comprehensive.

The generated registrations cover all the core condition expression types and follow the established pattern used elsewhere in the codebase. This confirms the T4 template is working as intended and should provide the desired performance improvement by eliminating runtime reflection for condition expression properties.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@snakefoot snakefoot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 27, 2025 19:55
@snakefoot snakefoot merged commit 01ace0e into NLog:dev Jun 27, 2025
6 checks passed
@snakefoot snakefoot added this to the 6.0.1 milestone Jun 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement Improvement on existing feature size/S

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant