Skip to content

Conversation

@snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor

@snakefoot snakefoot commented Jun 27, 2025

Resolves #5903 - Followup to #5712

@snakefoot snakefoot added the bug Bug report / Bug fix label Jun 27, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the XML parser's error handling logic to no longer throw an exception when encountering the '>' character in element values, only flagging an error for unencoded '<'. Additionally, new unit tests were added to verify parsing of XML elements containing expressions with the '>' character.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/NLog/Internal/XmlParser.cs Modified error handling in ReadUntilChar to only throw on unencoded '<', not '>', and updated error message.
tests/NLog.UnitTests/Internal/XmlParserTests.cs Added two test cases to verify parsing of XML with 'level >= LogLevel.Warn' expressions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as XmlParserTests
    participant Parser as XmlParser
    Test->>Parser: Parse XML with element containing 'level >= LogLevel.Warn'
    Parser->>Parser: ReadUntilChar processes value
    alt Value contains '>'
        Parser-->>Test: Successfully parses element value
    else Value contains unencoded '<'
        Parser-->>Test: Throws exception with encoding suggestion
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix parsing failure for XML config elements containing '>' (e.g., <defaultFilter>level >= LogLevel.Warn</defaultFilter>) [#5903]
Remove exception for '>' in element values, only error on unencoded '<' [#5903]
Add/verify unit tests for parsing XML with 'level >= LogLevel.Warn' expressions [#5903]

Poem

A nibble of code, a hop and a leap,
Now '>' in XML no longer makes us weep.
The parser munches on filters with glee,
While tests confirm it—bug-free as can be!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44ad943 and 09a43a6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/NLog/Internal/XmlParser.cs (1 hunks)
  • tests/NLog.UnitTests/Internal/XmlParserTests.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/NLog/Internal/XmlParser.cs
  • tests/NLog.UnitTests/Internal/XmlParserTests.cs

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/NLog/Internal/XmlParser.cs (1)

493-494: Fix the XML entity syntax in the error message.

The logic change to allow '>' characters in XML content is correct and aligns with the PR objective. However, the error message suggests incorrect XML entity syntax.

Apply this diff to fix the XML entity syntax:

-                    throw new XmlParserException($"Invalid XML document. Cannot parse value with '<', maybe encode to $lt;");
+                    throw new XmlParserException($"Invalid XML document. Cannot parse value with '<', maybe encode to &lt;");

The standard XML entity for '<' is &lt;, not $lt;.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12ffd2e and 44ad943.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/NLog/Internal/XmlParser.cs (1 hunks)
  • tests/NLog.UnitTests/Internal/XmlParserTests.cs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/NLog/Internal/XmlParser.cs (1)
src/NLog/Config/XmlParserException.cs (4)
  • XmlParserException (41-68)
  • XmlParserException (46-48)
  • XmlParserException (54-57)
  • XmlParserException (64-67)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/NLog.UnitTests/Internal/XmlParserTests.cs (1)

300-300: Excellent test coverage for the '>' character parsing enhancement.

The new test cases provide comprehensive coverage for the XML parser changes, testing both attribute values and element inner text scenarios with the '>' character in level >= LogLevel.Warn expressions. The tests are well-structured and align perfectly with the PR objective.

Also applies to: 303-303

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@snakefoot snakefoot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 27, 2025 18:26
@snakefoot snakefoot merged commit e843833 into NLog:dev Jun 27, 2025
6 checks passed
@snakefoot snakefoot added this to the 6.0.1 milestone Jun 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Bug report / Bug fix size/XS

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Version 6 Parse of config file fails on existing configuration

1 participant