AsyncTaskTarget_TestThrottleOnTaskDelay - More logging and increase treshold#3279
Merged
repo-ranger[bot] merged 1 commit intoNLog:devfrom Apr 5, 2019
Conversation
Member
|
thanks! Would be great to get the build more stable. Restarting is now almost a daily task.. |
Member
|
would another option to call FlushAsync and use the AsyncContinuation.WaitOne? |
Contributor
Author
|
The test ensures that the target performs correctly without doing explicit flushes. |
Member
|
ok good one :) |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #3279 +/- ##
======================================
+ Coverage 80% 80% +<1%
======================================
Files 355 356 +1
Lines 28002 28007 +5
Branches 3728 3728
======================================
+ Hits 22340 22393 +53
+ Misses 4583 4537 -46
+ Partials 1079 1077 -2 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Trying to resolve #3277