feat(notifications): persist order cancellations in history with context#602
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (9)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
WalkthroughThreads previous order status and a user-initiated-cancel flag through notifiers into NotificationDataExtractor, which now persists Action.canceled notifications (optionally adding previous_status). Message mapper and localization add keys for seller vs buyer inactivity; auto-expiration uses the centralized notify path with a stable eventId. ChangesOrder cancellation notification for inactivity detection
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Subscribe as AbstractMostroNotifier.subscribe()
participant HandleEvent as AbstractMostroNotifier.handleEvent()
participant Extractor as NotificationDataExtractor.extractFromMostroMessage()
participant Mapper as NotificationMessageMapper.getMessageKeyWithContext()
participant Notify as NotificationActionsProvider.notifier.notify()
Subscribe->>HandleEvent: call with previousStatus, wasUserInitiatedCancel
HandleEvent->>Extractor: extractFromMostroMessage(event, session, previousStatus, wasUserInitiatedCancel)
Extractor->>Mapper: getMessageKeyWithContext(Action.canceled, values)
Mapper->>Notify: notify(Action.canceled, NotificationData)
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@lib/features/order/notifiers/order_notifier.dart`:
- Around line 187-193: The notify call in order_notifier.dart that persists
auto-expiration cancellations (using
ref.read(notificationActionsProvider.notifier) and notify with Action.canceled)
must include a stable eventId to avoid duplicate history entries; update the
notify invocation to pass a deterministic eventId (for example a string like
"auto_expire:<orderId>" or a hash based on orderId + expirationTimestamp) via
the eventId parameter so repeated emissions of the same cancellation won't
create duplicate notifications.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: c2f7c680-aecf-4829-b16e-91bc188b1315
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
lib/features/notifications/utils/notification_data_extractor.dartlib/features/notifications/utils/notification_message_mapper.dartlib/features/order/notifiers/abstract_mostro_notifier.dartlib/features/order/notifiers/order_notifier.dartlib/l10n/intl_de.arblib/l10n/intl_en.arblib/l10n/intl_es.arblib/l10n/intl_fr.arblib/l10n/intl_it.arb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0b4f402eb9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Revisión Hermes
Veredicto: NO aprobaría este PR todavía.
Hay un problema funcional: el nuevo criterio usa solo previous_status para decidir si la cancelación fue por inactividad. Eso mezcla cancelaciones manuales con expiraciones reales y puede mostrar un mensaje falso en el historial.
Necesita un discriminador más preciso antes de entrar.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@lib/features/order/notifiers/order_notifier.dart`:
- Around line 127-131: The code sets the user-initiated cancel flag via
AbstractMostroNotifier.markUserInitiatedCancel(orderId) before awaiting
mostroService.cancelOrder(orderId); if the async call throws the flag remains
set and later Action.canceled may be misclassified—wrap the await in a
try/catch, and in the catch call the corresponding rollback/unmark method (e.g.,
AbstractMostroNotifier.unmarkUserInitiatedCancel(orderId) or the actual method
that clears the flag) before rethrowing the error so the flag is only left set
on successful cancel.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 0141b9cb-d938-47c6-ba1f-4589e8423f88
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
lib/features/notifications/utils/notification_data_extractor.dartlib/features/order/notifiers/abstract_mostro_notifier.dartlib/features/order/notifiers/order_notifier.dart
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Revisión Hermes
Veredicto: todavía no lo aprobaría.
El commit arregla el caso principal, pero dejó un hueco: el flag de markUserInitiatedCancel() se setea antes de await mostroService.cancelOrder(orderId) y nunca se limpia si esa llamada falla o no llega a emitir Action.canceled. Eso deja estado colgado y puede contaminar una cancelación posterior del mismo orderId.
La solución debería limpiar el flag en un try/finally o moverlo a una estructura con expiración/caducidad.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hermes review
Approved.
The previous blocker is fixed: manual cancels are now tagged separately, the fallback is generic when the cancel was user-initiated, and the failure path now rolls back the marker so it does not leak into later events. The notification history behavior is now consistent for inactivity vs manual cancellation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I re-checked the current head and I do not see a remaining blocking issue.
What I specifically verified after the earlier review concerns:
- Manual cancels are no longer misclassified as counterparty inactivity.
previous_statusonly drives the inactivity-specific message when the cancel was not user-initiated, so waiting-payment / waiting-buyer-invoice manual cancels now correctly fall back to the generic cancellation message. - The user-initiated cancel marker is rolled back if
mostroService.cancelOrder(orderId)throws, so it does not leak into a later unrelatedAction.canceledfor the same orderId. - Auto-expiration now goes through the centralized notify/history path with a stable
eventId, which is the right way to persist the event without duplicate entries. - Persisting
Action.canceledin notification history with contextual messaging is the right product behavior here, and the notifier/data-extractor threading is scoped to that purpose.
I would still welcome focused tests around the manual-cancel vs inactivity classification path, because this logic is stateful and easy to regress. But on the current revision I do not see a blocker that should hold merge.
Approved.
06163dd
2a95305 to
06163dd
Compare
…essages - Add previousStatus parameter to notification extraction and event handling chain to differentiate cancellation reasons - Map Action.canceled to specific messages based on previous status (waiting-payment → seller inactivity, waiting-buyer-invoice → buyer inactivity) - Remove early return for canceled orders in NotificationDataExtractor; persist all cancellations to notification history - Replace custom showCustomMessage calls
…activity timeouts
…prevent misclassification
06163dd to
5c91953
Compare
Summary
Closes #535.
When an order is canceled due to counterparty inactivity in
waiting-paymentorwaiting-buyer-invoice, the user previously only saw a transient SnackBar — the event never reached the notifications screen (bell icon), so they could not review what happened to the order afterwards.This PR persists every
Action.canceledevent to the notification history with a context-aware message based on the order's previous status:waiting-payment→ "The seller did not continue the order. The order has been cancelled."waiting-buyer-invoice→ "The buyer did not continue the order. The order has been cancelled."Changes
NotificationDataExtractor: newpreviousStatusparameter;Action.canceledno longer returnsnull(which previously skipped persistence) and instead emitsNotificationDatawithprevious_statusinvalues.NotificationMessageMapper.getMessageKeyWithContext: resolves the correct localization key forAction.canceledbased onprevious_status.AbstractMostroNotifier.subscribe(): capturespreviousStatus = state.statusbeforestate.updateWith(msg)and forwards it throughhandleEvent→ extractor.AbstractMostroNotifier.handleEvent(): removed the now-redundantshowCustomMessage('orderCanceled')call — the centralizednotify()path already shows the SnackBar and persists to history.OrderNotifier: forwardspreviousStatusin itshandleEventoverride and converts the pending-order-expiryshowCustomMessage('orderCanceled')to anotify(Action.canceled, ...)call so it also appears in the history.notification_order_canceled_by_seller_inactivity_messageandnotification_order_canceled_by_buyer_inactivity_messagetoen,es,it,de,fr.Test plan
fvm flutter analyze→ no issues (verified)fvm flutter test→ all tests pass (verified, 369/369)Action.canceled, open the notifications screen and verify the "seller did not continue" message appearsSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Localization