Skip to content

chore(runway): cherry-pick chore: bump axios 16.1#30847

Merged
tommasini merged 1 commit into
release/7.80.0from
runway-cherry-pick-7.80.0-1780313772
Jun 1, 2026
Merged

chore(runway): cherry-pick chore: bump axios 16.1#30847
tommasini merged 1 commit into
release/7.80.0from
runway-cherry-pick-7.80.0-1780313772

Conversation

@runway-github

@runway-github runway-github Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fix audit issue: GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh

Changelog

CHANGELOG entry:

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Performance checks (if applicable)

  • I've tested on Android
    • Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
  • I've tested with a power user scenario
  • Use these power-user
    SRPs

    to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
  • I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
    performance metrics
  • See trace() for usage and
    addToken
    for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the Performance
Guide
.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
    app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
    in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
    as recordings and or screenshots.

Note

Low Risk
Dependency-only security patch with no app code changes; standard
patch-level HTTP client upgrade.

Overview
Bumps axios from ^1.15.x to ^1.16.0 in package.json
(direct dependency and Yarn resolutions) and refreshes
yarn.lock so the tree resolves to axios 1.16.1, addressing
advisory
GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh.

The lockfile also picks up follow-redirects 1.16.0 and axios’s
updated transitive deps (e.g. https-proxy-agent). No application
source changes.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit
e4f36bb. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
here.

[3e5edf7](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/commit/3e5edf71a8926498ca3ff22d2582e66f9faae6d3)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.

Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until this PR meets the canonical
Definition of Ready For Review in `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.

In short: the template must be materially complete (not just section
titles
present), all status checks must be currently passing, and the only
expected
follow-up commits must be reviewer-driven.
-->

## **Description**
Fix audit issue: GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh
<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

```gherkin
Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]
```

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.

Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->

- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I've included tests if applicable
- [ ] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

#### Performance checks (if applicable)

- [ ] I've tested on Android
  - Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [ ] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [ ] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> Dependency-only security patch with no app code changes; standard
patch-level HTTP client upgrade.
> 
> **Overview**
> Bumps **axios** from `^1.15.x` to **`^1.16.0`** in `package.json`
(direct dependency and Yarn **resolutions**) and refreshes
**`yarn.lock`** so the tree resolves to **axios 1.16.1**, addressing
advisory
[GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh](GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh).
> 
> The lockfile also picks up **follow-redirects** `1.16.0` and axios’s
updated transitive deps (e.g. **https-proxy-agent**). No application
source changes.
> 
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
e4f36bb. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Smart E2E Test Selection

⏭️ Smart E2E selection skipped - PR targets a release or stable branch (release/* or stable)

All E2E tests pre-selected.

View GitHub Actions results

@tommasini tommasini enabled auto-merge (squash) June 1, 2026 12:12
@vpintorico vpintorico added the team-mobile-platform Mobile Platform team label Jun 1, 2026
@tommasini tommasini merged commit 979fd17 into release/7.80.0 Jun 1, 2026
206 of 210 checks passed
@tommasini tommasini deleted the runway-cherry-pick-7.80.0-1780313772 branch June 1, 2026 12:31
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 1, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants