Skip to content

chore(runway): cherry-pick test: upload Test Plan JSON file to artifacts#29347

Merged
chloeYue merged 1 commit into
release/7.75.0from
runway-cherry-pick-7.75.0-1777064893
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

chore(runway): cherry-pick test: upload Test Plan JSON file to artifacts#29347
chloeYue merged 1 commit into
release/7.75.0from
runway-cherry-pick-7.75.0-1777064893

Conversation

@runway-github

@runway-github runway-github Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fix broken Test Plan JSON link by uploading as GitHub Actions artifact
instead of gh-pages (which is blocked by branch protection).
Changes

  • Replace gh-pages upload with actions/upload-artifact@v4 (unzipped)
  • Update PR comment to link to build workflow for artifact access

Changelog

CHANGELOG entry: null

Related issues

Fixes:
https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/MCRM-69

Manual testing steps

Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Performance checks (if applicable)

  • I've tested on Android
    • Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
  • I've tested with a power user scenario
  • Use these power-user
    SRPs

    to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
  • I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
    performance metrics
  • See trace() for usage and
    addToken
    for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the Performance
Guide
.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
    app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
    in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
    as recordings and or screenshots. e741248

…cts (#29337)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.

Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until this PR meets the canonical
Definition of Ready For Review in `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.

In short: the template must be materially complete (not just section
titles
present), all status checks must be currently passing, and the only
expected
follow-up commits must be reviewer-driven.
-->

## **Description**
Fix broken Test Plan JSON link by uploading as GitHub Actions artifact
instead of gh-pages (which is blocked by branch protection).
Changes
- Replace gh-pages upload with actions/upload-artifact@v4 (unzipped)
- Update PR comment to link to build workflow for artifact access
<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry: null

## **Related issues**

Fixes:
https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/MCRM-69
## **Manual testing steps**

```gherkin
Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]
```

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.

Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->

- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I've included tests if applicable
- [ ] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

#### Performance checks (if applicable)

- [ ] I've tested on Android
  - Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [ ] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [ ] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
@runway-github runway-github Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner April 24, 2026 21:08
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@metamaskbotv2 metamaskbotv2 Bot added the team-bots Bot team (for MetaMask Bot, Runway Bot, etc.) label Apr 24, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Smart E2E Test Selection

⏭️ Smart E2E selection skipped - PR targets a release branch (release/*)

All E2E tests pre-selected.

View GitHub Actions results

@chloeYue chloeYue left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@chloeYue chloeYue enabled auto-merge (squash) April 24, 2026 21:09
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

E2E Fixture Validation — Schema is up to date
12 value mismatches detected (expected — fixture represents an existing user).
View details

@chloeYue chloeYue merged commit 3e564e0 into release/7.75.0 Apr 24, 2026
113 checks passed
@chloeYue chloeYue deleted the runway-cherry-pick-7.75.0-1777064893 branch April 24, 2026 22:01
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 24, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

size-S team-bots Bot team (for MetaMask Bot, Runway Bot, etc.)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants