Skip to content

Add provisions for early season grace period.#185

Merged
ca333 merged 1 commit intoKomodoPlatform:devfrom
smk762:patch-12
Jul 7, 2020
Merged

Add provisions for early season grace period.#185
ca333 merged 1 commit intoKomodoPlatform:devfrom
smk762:patch-12

Conversation

@smk762
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@smk762 smk762 commented Jul 7, 2020

This should give time for rule clarity and tweaking of processes etc to avoid unintended mass culling of the NN group while initial rule-sets are scrutinized, adapted and more explicitly defined with respect to actual conditions within the network.

For example - Reach at least 33% of your region’s best monthly NN notarization score. This is checked on the first day of each month, beginning one month after the new NN season has begun. has been tagged for review due to early notarisation figures indicating skewed distribution (e.g. in SH region, #1 node has 2x score of #2 node)

I'd encourage NN ops to discuss a revised metric and submit it in accordance with the "polls and voting" section of the NN bible.

This should give time for rule clarity and tweaking of processes etc to avoid unintended mass culling of the NN group while initial rule-sets are scrutinized, adapted and more explicitly defined with respect to actual conditions within the network.
For example - `Reach at least 33% of your region’s best monthly NN notarization score. This is checked on the first day of each month, beginning one month after the new NN season has begun.` has been tagged for review due to early notarisation figures indicating skewed distribution (e.g. in SH region, #1 node has 2x score of #2 node)
I'd encourage NN ops to discuss a revised metric and submit it in accordance with the "polls and voting" section of the NN bible.
@ca333 ca333 mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2020
@ca333 ca333 merged commit 4351de5 into KomodoPlatform:dev Jul 7, 2020
@Cris-F
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Cris-F commented Jul 7, 2020

Has there been any thought put in to who, if any, will replace any nodes that may be removed? Runners up from the election would generally need some notice and checking if they are still interested and available seems necessary.

@zatJUM
Copy link
Copy Markdown

zatJUM commented Jul 7, 2020

Perhaps instead of 33% of your region’s best monthly NN notarization score we could do something like not less than x% under region average?

@TheComputerGenie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

TheComputerGenie commented Jul 7, 2020

Perhaps instead of 33% of your region’s best monthly NN notarization score we could do something like not less than x% under region average?

Even that wouldn't change much, unless you remove the top producer from the average; however, doing that would defeat the spirit of even having the rule in the first place.
Having a "grace period" (although I believe 2.5 months to be too long) where the stats are ignored and only Sept 1 - Oct 1 (and so on) are looked at is more than reasonable. If one hasn't figured it out in 2.5 months (plus the time length of testnet), chances are they aren't going to.

@Cris-F Cris-F mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants