Skip to content

docs: add section to fee abstraction readme on feature being used automaticly#327

Merged
Thaleszh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/explicit-feeabstraction-optin
Apr 10, 2026
Merged

docs: add section to fee abstraction readme on feature being used automaticly#327
Thaleszh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/explicit-feeabstraction-optin

Conversation

@Thaleszh

@Thaleszh Thaleszh commented Apr 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Improved readme with a section mentioning the auto-usage of other tokens and the price being estimated by default.

Type of change

  • Documentation (updates documentation on the project)

@Thaleszh Thaleszh requested a review from jhelison as a code owner April 10, 2026 15:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bbda043d-9e72-43c9-9300-e0daa0f2aca5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 130a479 and b894f5e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/feeabstraction/README.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • x/feeabstraction/README.md

Walkthrough

The x/feeabstraction/README.md was updated to state that fee abstraction is mandatory: when a user lacks native funds for gas, fees will be paid using enabled alternate fee tokens if the user holds sufficient balance. The README lists the conditions that trigger alternate-token fee usage and clarifies that price validity and clamping refer to estimated token prices, since token prices are updated at BeginBlock and transaction-time values may be approximate.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding documentation about automatic fee abstraction feature usage in the README.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, mentioning the README improvements about auto-usage of tokens and estimated pricing.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/explicit-feeabstraction-optin

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot reviewed Apr 10, 2026
View reviewed changes

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents 
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@x/feeabstraction/README.md`:
- Around line 16-19: Update the README section text to correct grammar: change
"we'll be payed" to "will be paid", make "alternate token" plural as "alternate
tokens", and replace the incomplete phrase "enabled as alternate fee" with
"enabled as an alternate fee token" so the three bullet points read clearly and
grammatically correct.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7dd53d6c-343a-42e8-96d8-eed07c1831b9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 643a819 and 130a479.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/feeabstraction/README.md

Comment thread x/feeabstraction/README.md Outdated
jhelison
jhelison previously approved these changes Apr 10, 2026
View reviewed changes
@Thaleszh Thaleszh merged commit c60eff3 into main Apr 10, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed
@Thaleszh Thaleszh deleted the docs/explicit-feeabstraction-optin branch April 10, 2026 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@jhelison jhelison jhelison approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Thaleszh @jhelison