Skip to content

docs: add edge cases and decision flows for reward module readme#321

Merged
Thaleszh merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/reward-edge-case
Apr 7, 2026
Merged

docs: add edge cases and decision flows for reward module readme#321
Thaleszh merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/reward-edge-case

Conversation

@Thaleszh

@Thaleszh Thaleszh commented Apr 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Add edge cases and decision flows for reward module readme

Type of change

  • Documentation (updates documentation on the project)

@Thaleszh Thaleszh requested a review from jhelison as a code owner April 7, 2026 20:02
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the x/rewards/README.md file by adding a new "Edge cases and decisions" section that documents governance and proposal interaction constraints related to reward schedule overrides, denom change behavior (including how QueryParamsRequest reflects changes during active schedules), and the non-recoverable nature of leftover tokens that can only be distributed through subsequent schedules. The file formatting was also corrected by adding a newline at the end of the file.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: adding documentation about edge cases and decision flows to the reward module README.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, clearly stating that edge cases and decision flows are being added to the reward module README.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/reward-edge-case

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot reviewed Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents 
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@x/rewards/README.md`:
- Line 42: Reword the sentence to reference the query response/endpoint instead
of the request type: replace "QueryParamsRequest" with "the Params query
(QueryParamsResponse)" or similar wording so it states that the Params
query/QueryParamsResponse will return the new denom even if a current schedule
exists for the old denom; update mentions of "request" to "response" or "params
query endpoint" and keep the meaning unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 41ee697c-a865-4026-9657-c294085870bb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 988d05f and 6f37fc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/rewards/README.md

Comment thread x/rewards/README.md
@Thaleszh Thaleszh merged commit 16d7ad8 into main Apr 7, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed
@Thaleszh Thaleszh deleted the docs/reward-edge-case branch April 7, 2026 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@jhelison jhelison jhelison approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Thaleszh @jhelison