Skip to content

adopt a consistent version history table convention #1001

@bashbaug

Description

@bashbaug

We seem to have several different conventions for version history in the OpenCL Extension Specification:

Some extensions (a total of 3) have the older versions at the top of the table and the newer versions at the bottom.

Other extensions (also a total of 3) have the newer versions at the top of the table and the older versions at the bottom.

I think we should have one convention and use it consistently. Which to we prefer?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    Done

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions