On Julia 0.4.5 and the latest release of StatsBase:
y = [0.40003674665581906,0.4085630862624367,0.41662034698690303,0.41662034698690303,0.42189053966652057,0.42189053966652057,0.42553514344518345,0.43985732442991354]
issorted(quantile(y, linspace(0.01, 0.99, 17))) # false
The quantiles are:
[0.4006335904282823,0.4042892585346196,0.40794492664095694,
0.4114334853955278,0.41488803593114276,
0.41662034698690303,0.416620346986903, # these two not in order
0.4169958482153258,0.41925544332671183,0.4215150384380978,0.42189053966652057,
0.42189053966652057,0.4226741294789331,0.42423675334903477,0.42657350156657636,
0.4327141366637794,0.4388547717609824]
Is that a bug, or is it a conscious decision to define "empty quantiles"?
On Julia 0.4.5 and the latest release of StatsBase:
The quantiles are:
Is that a bug, or is it a conscious decision to define "empty quantiles"?