Skip to content

Conversation

@goerz
Copy link
Member

@goerz goerz commented Sep 3, 2024

This is much easier for a user to deal with. It really shouldn't make any difference for performance, and in fact, may enhance it (the old implementation was using copyto!). In situations where it would make a difference, like for insanely large pulses, there's always the option of using a non-allocating functor.

This is much easier for a user to deal with. It really shouldn't make
any difference for performance, and in fact, may enhance it (the old
implementation was using `copyto!`). In situations where it would make a
difference, like for insanely large pulses, there's always the option of
using a non-allocating functor.
@goerz goerz added enhancement New feature or request breaking PRs that break compatibility labels Sep 3, 2024
@goerz goerz merged commit 14068fe into master Sep 3, 2024
@goerz goerz deleted the grad_J_a-not-in-place branch September 3, 2024 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking PRs that break compatibility enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants