Replace some uses of Array by Vector or Matrix#60154
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
CI failures look real. This looks quite reasonable. Changing tests is much less important and also I wouldn't want to entirely eliminate Array{T, 1} and Array{T, 2} in tests, just for coverage. |
e99fb7d to
cbf449d
Compare
Member
Author
|
Oh yeah the test failure was real and stupid, should be fixed now (well, that one at least; there might be more -- I'll check the CI logs once things have run through) |
Member
Author
|
As far as I can tell the errors are CI "normal" (unfortunately) right now |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Progress towards issue #56922 by @LilithHafner. Turns out I didn't find many uses of
Array{T, 1}orArray{T, 2}indocorbasethat were "clearly" in need of being updated toVectororMatrix.There are a bunch that can't be changed because they occur before
VectororMatrixare even defined.There are a couple borderline cases, and I may have overlooked some, but most I looked at felt like "I could change it to Vector or Matrix but I think there is a didactical point in using
Arrayhere. E.g. in the definition ofstruct BitVector <: AbstractArray{Bool, 1}; endI think the context makes it desirable to leave it at that instead of changing it toVector-- but I admit this is subjective.There was more in
test, though that's perhaps less important.All in all I think we could close #56922