Skip to content

TypedSyntax.jl: drop old version support#553

Merged
aviatesk merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
avi/typed-syntax-version
Mar 3, 2024
Merged

TypedSyntax.jl: drop old version support#553
aviatesk merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
avi/typed-syntax-version

Conversation

@aviatesk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@aviatesk aviatesk commented Mar 3, 2024

Given that Cthulhu is the only user of TypedSyntax currently, and considering the newer versions of Cthulhu no longer supports older Julia versions like 1.6, I believe there isn't much merit in maintaining support for older Julia versions within TypedSyntax. We anticipate the need for fixes to TypedSyntax's reflection capabilities, like #547, however, continuing to provide support for these features across older versions proves to be a significant hassle. Therefore, I'm inclined to match TypedSyntax.jl's supported Julia version with that of Cthulhu.

Additionally, we've found that if Cthulhu's tests fail, TypedSyntax.jl's tests don't get executed, leading to unnoticed regressions in the latter. So I've opted to separate and individually run the tests for both Cthulhu and TypedSyntax.

Given that Cthulhu is the only user of TypedSyntax currently, and
considering the newer versions of Cthulhu no longer supports older Julia
versions like 1.6, I believe there isn't much merit in maintaining
support for older Julia versions within TypedSyntax. We anticipate the need
for fixes to TypedSyntax's reflection capabilities, like #547, however,
continuing to provide support for these features across older versions
proves to be a significant hassle. Therefore, I'm inclined to match
TypedSyntax.jl's supported Julia version with that of Cthulhu.

Additionally, we've found that if Cthulhu's tests fail, TypedSyntax.jl's
tests don't get executed, leading to unnoticed regressions in the
latter. So I've opted to separate and individually run the tests for
both Cthulhu and TypedSyntax.
@aviatesk aviatesk requested a review from timholy March 3, 2024 10:21
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Mar 3, 2024

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (33c2379) to head (520fbfd).
⚠️ Report is 122 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #553   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files           9       9           
  Lines        1507    1532   +25     
======================================
- Misses       1507    1532   +25     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@aviatesk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

aviatesk commented Mar 3, 2024

I haven't received any reviews yet, but I'm considering merging this in order for #547 and other PRs to make progress. If anyone wants to keep support for versions 1.6~1.9, please inform me. I'm willing to take responsibility for any necessary reverts.

Note that the failures of TypedSyntaxCI on 1.11-nightly and nightly are not new regression, but existing ones (although we may have not perceived yet).

@aviatesk aviatesk merged commit 8d34d4d into master Mar 3, 2024
@aviatesk aviatesk deleted the avi/typed-syntax-version branch March 3, 2024 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants