There seem to exist a bibtex tool producing following data:
Date-Added = {2015-04-29 11:46:47 +0000},
Date-Modified = {2015-04-29 11:48:44 +0000},
In JabRef, we have timestamp.
We should migrate to date-..., because date-... has more semantics.
@pautasso It seems, this is from you, isn't it? Which tool are you using? 😇
(extract from JabRef#995)
date-added = {2014-02-17 12:06:22 +0000},
date-modified = {2015-06-02 20:04:28 +0000},
I currently don't know, which software writes these data fields. I think, however, that we should migrate from timestamp to date-* as the semantics of timestamp is not clear at first sight: Is it the timestamp of the last modification or the timestamp of the creation? Furthermore: Why is no time included? Furthermore: Why is no ISO date used?
There seem to exist a bibtex tool producing following data:
In JabRef, we have
timestamp.We should migrate to
date-..., becausedate-...has more semantics.@pautasso It seems, this is from you, isn't it? Which tool are you using? 😇
(extract from JabRef#995)
I currently don't know, which software writes these data fields. I think, however, that we should migrate from
timestamptodate-*as the semantics oftimestampis not clear at first sight: Is it the timestamp of the last modification or the timestamp of the creation? Furthermore: Why is no time included? Furthermore: Why is no ISO date used?