-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
DOI fetcher for medra #6602
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
[outdated] type: enhancementcomponent: fetchergood first issueAn issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty.An issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
[outdated] type: enhancementcomponent: fetchergood first issueAn issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty.An issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Is your suggestion for improvement related to a problem? Please describe.
A DOI I was searching for recently didn't work from within Jabref. 10.2143/JIABS.41.0.3285748
When I tried Crossref.org directly, it also didn't work. When I queried the publisher, they said they registered their DOIs with Medra, not Crossref, because they are a European publisher.
I find this an inadequate answer from the publisher. The whole point of DOIs is that they should be universal, not grouped in ghettos.
Describe the solution you'd like
Nevertheless, if that is how it is, could JabRef please also fallover to the Medra resolver if crossref doesn't work