Skip to content

Conversation

@dallan-keylogic
Copy link
Contributor

Summary/Motivation:

Now that #1683 has been merged, we should unpin Pyomo. I'd like to require versions greater than 6.9.5 because an issue with the IPOPT solver parser was fixed in that version. (Is there any particular reason we should allow earlier versions?)

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

  1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
  2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.43%. Comparing base (8f96b37) to head (05bce4b).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1705      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.45%   77.43%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         395      395              
  Lines       64792    64792              
  Branches    10902    10902              
==========================================
- Hits        50186    50173      -13     
- Misses      12095    12105      +10     
- Partials     2511     2514       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@blnicho
Copy link
Member

blnicho commented Nov 18, 2025

@dallan-keylogic I think we should be fine to unpin the Pyomo version for IDAES but we should double check which version of Pyomo WaterTAP and Prommis are being tested against. If they start testing against Pyomo 6.9.5, there is a chance they could hit the same pylint failures we saw in IDAES.

@ksbeattie ksbeattie added the Priority:High High Priority Issue or PR label Nov 19, 2025
Copy link
Member

@ksbeattie ksbeattie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me, though I'd like to get @sufikaur to look at this too.

@ksbeattie ksbeattie marked this pull request as ready for review November 19, 2025 17:28
@ksbeattie ksbeattie requested a review from sufikaur as a code owner November 19, 2025 17:28
@dallan-keylogic dallan-keylogic merged commit 37e21e4 into IDAES:main Nov 20, 2025
49 checks passed
@dallan-keylogic dallan-keylogic deleted the revert_pyomo_pin branch November 20, 2025 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Priority:High High Priority Issue or PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants