Skip to content

Conversation

@MarcusHolly
Copy link
Contributor

Summary/Motivation:

Adds a literature-based method to the pricetaker model for determining the optimal number of clusters that a dataset should be broken into

Changes proposed in this PR:

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

  1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
  2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 25, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 9.09091% with 50 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.00%. Comparing base (b7d04f7) to head (d49561c).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...aes/apps/grid_integration/pricetaker/clustering.py 5.88% 48 Missing ⚠️
...s/grid_integration/pricetaker/price_taker_model.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1579      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.05%   77.00%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         395      395              
  Lines       63512    63555      +43     
  Branches    10358    10365       +7     
==========================================
- Hits        48942    48941       -1     
- Misses      12130    12175      +45     
+ Partials     2440     2439       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@MarcusHolly MarcusHolly marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2025 14:05
@ksbeattie ksbeattie added DISPATCHES WaterTAP Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR labels Feb 27, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@radhakrishnatg radhakrishnatg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a few changes. Please see my comments below.

Copy link
Contributor

@adam-a-a adam-a-a left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@radhakrishnatg radhakrishnatg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thank you, @MarcusHolly, for making all the requested changes!

@adam-a-a
Copy link
Contributor

adam-a-a commented Jul 3, 2025

Merging this and bypassing codecov/patch
image

@adam-a-a adam-a-a merged commit c84a7fe into IDAES:main Jul 3, 2025
54 of 55 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

DISPATCHES Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR WaterTAP

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants