Skip to content

Add NUMA-aware scheduling in GKE clusters (enabled for G4)#4760

Merged
kadupoornima merged 1 commit into
GoogleCloudPlatform:developfrom
kadupoornima:numa-nodepool
Oct 14, 2025
Merged

Add NUMA-aware scheduling in GKE clusters (enabled for G4)#4760
kadupoornima merged 1 commit into
GoogleCloudPlatform:developfrom
kadupoornima:numa-nodepool

Conversation

@kadupoornima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added support for enabling NUMA-aware scheduling in GKE clusters. Currently required and added for G4 NPI.

Reference: https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/distributed-cloud/bare-metal/docs/vm-runtime/numa#numa_nodes

TF support for this has been provided from 7.2 onwards, so provider versions have been updated in a previous PR accordingly.

make tests pass. Tested for G4 GKE, manual cluster creation successful. kubelet config for node shows correct options set.

@kadupoornima kadupoornima added the release-key-new-features Added to release notes under the "Key New Features" heading. label Oct 13, 2025
@kadupoornima kadupoornima marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2025 12:27
@kadupoornima kadupoornima requested review from a team and samskillman as code owners October 13, 2025 12:27
@kadupoornima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Triggered tests with the babysit tool.

@SwarnaBharathiMantena SwarnaBharathiMantena left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Please re-run the failed tests.

@kadupoornima kadupoornima merged commit f4bef28 into GoogleCloudPlatform:develop Oct 14, 2025
23 of 63 checks passed
@kadupoornima kadupoornima deleted the numa-nodepool branch October 16, 2025 06:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-key-new-features Added to release notes under the "Key New Features" heading.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants