Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
Member
|
Related: #7924 |
Member
|
Not every user has lazy loaded enabled. Shouldn’t we just disable |
Member
Author
|
Why? |
Member
|
If it is a security issue to have |
Member
Author
|
It's not, at that point |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up of #7636
I found it's the only missing element that needs to be lazy loaded by putting HTML of https://github.com/cure53/HTTPLeaks/blob/main/leak.html into a feed:
Show feed XML
Before it can be seen that a request is being made to
https://leaking.via/track-srcupon page load with the article present, and now no requests are being made toleaking.viauntil the article is opened manually / lazy-loading is disabled.