Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2025. It is now read-only.

feat: add OpImageSampleExplicitLod to spirv-std#498

Merged
XAMPPRocky merged 1 commit intoEmbarkStudios:mainfrom
DeanBDean:add-image-sample-explicit-lod
Mar 19, 2021
Merged

feat: add OpImageSampleExplicitLod to spirv-std#498
XAMPPRocky merged 1 commit intoEmbarkStudios:mainfrom
DeanBDean:add-image-sample-explicit-lod

Conversation

@DeanBDean
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@DeanBDean DeanBDean commented Mar 16, 2021

@DeanBDean DeanBDean force-pushed the add-image-sample-explicit-lod branch 3 times, most recently from 24062d5 to 355fe64 Compare March 17, 2021 12:37
@DeanBDean DeanBDean marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2021 12:38
@DeanBDean DeanBDean changed the title WIP feat: add OpImageSampleExplicitLod to spirv-std feat: add OpImageSampleExplicitLod to spirv-std Mar 17, 2021
@DeanBDean
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

So I don't love the code duplication here, but I'm not sure on the best way to get out of it. Since importing the inputs in the asm macro is a TokenStream, I believe it would require a macro or proc macro to handle properly. I didn't want to make one just for one use case because it seems like it might tie in to this issue #364

@DeanBDean DeanBDean force-pushed the add-image-sample-explicit-lod branch from 355fe64 to 878de0b Compare March 18, 2021 09:22
@DeanBDean DeanBDean force-pushed the add-image-sample-explicit-lod branch from 878de0b to 006777c Compare March 18, 2021 21:37
@DeanBDean DeanBDean force-pushed the add-image-sample-explicit-lod branch from 006777c to 8344a74 Compare March 18, 2021 21:40
@XAMPPRocky
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thank you for your PR!

@XAMPPRocky XAMPPRocky merged commit 9fb930b into EmbarkStudios:main Mar 19, 2021
@DeanBDean DeanBDean deleted the add-image-sample-explicit-lod branch March 19, 2021 10:58
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants