Skip to content

release: import v0.10 adoption handoff#862

Merged
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/import-v010-adoption-handoff
Jun 19, 2026
Merged

release: import v0.10 adoption handoff#862
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/import-v010-adoption-handoff

Conversation

@EffortlessSteven

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Imports the v0.10 adoption handoff from uselesskey-swarm into the source repo without changing versions, package metadata, release notes, tags, or publish authority.

The new handoff pins:

  • source base SHA 32bb2398c2f31a32d37f03bb0151c4eb88a7c9d5
  • swarm handoff SHA fd00a23f1efb3dd4701c1d15715ea032569fea85
  • swarm post-merge CI runs 27848122732 and 27848122731
  • command ledger, receipt contract, package proof boundary, deferred source PRs, non-claims, and rollback path

Fixes # (none)

Type of change

  • feat: New feature
  • fix: Bug fix
  • docs: Documentation update
  • style: Code style (formatting, etc)
  • refactor: Refactoring
  • perf: Performance improvement
  • test: Testing
  • chore: Maintenance
  • revert: Revert change

DevEx Checklist

Run these locally before submitting:

  • cargo xtask gate: Fmt, check, clippy, and test compile pass. Not run; docs-only handoff import.
  • cargo xtask typos: No misspellings.
  • cargo xtask bdd: BDD tests pass (if applicable). Not applicable; docs-only handoff import.
  • cargo xtask mutants: Mutation testing passes (if applicable). Not applicable; docs-only handoff import.

Additional validation run:

  • cargo xtask spec-check --strict
  • cargo xtask docs-sync --check
  • git diff --check

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. Not applicable; docs-only handoff import.
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes. Not run; docs-only handoff import.
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules. Not applicable; no downstream publication.

Non-goals

This PR does not prepare a v0.10.0 candidate, publish crates, tag v0.10.0, sign artifacts, create a GitHub release, or move release authority out of EffortlessMetrics/uselesskey.

What this enables next

Next source PR: release: prepare v0.10.0 candidate.


Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only handoff and index update; no runtime, dependency, or release-execution changes.

Overview
Adds a source-repo handoff that records the uselesskey-swarm v0.10 release-adoption work as imported documentation only, with no version bumps, crate metadata, tags, publish, or release-authority moves.

The new 2026-06-19-v0-10-adoption-handoff.md pins source and swarm SHAs, post-merge CI run IDs, linked specs, swarm packet paths, proof already run (swarm vs docs-only for this PR), and the boundaries for command ledger, bundle-audit.json receipt contract, package proof, blockers, deferred PR sequence, explicit non-goals, and rollback.

docs/handoffs/README.md gains a Release Handoffs section linking that file so operators can find the v0.10 adoption boundary from the handoff index.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8b661fc. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@EffortlessSteven, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 58 minutes and 44 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6c2580d0-f9ac-41be-bdec-cf2808a699bb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32bb239 and 8b661fc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/handoffs/2026-06-19-v0-10-adoption-handoff.md
  • docs/handoffs/README.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release/import-v010-adoption-handoff

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8b661fcac4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +134 to +136
cargo xtask check-bundle-schemas
cargo xtask check-audit-receipts
cargo xtask check-adoption-command-ledger

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Replace missing xtask commands before handoff use

In the current source repo these three commands are not xtask subcommands—I checked the Cmd enum in xtask/src/main.rs and a repo-wide rg, and these names only appear in this new handoff. Since this block is the required rerun list for the package-proven source lane, an operator following it will abort before reaching the actual release evidence unless the commands are added or replaced with existing source checks.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven merged commit ace29dd into main Jun 19, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven deleted the release/import-v010-adoption-handoff branch June 19, 2026 22:59
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_9011460b-d2d3-4fcf-9606-5c180cf77bfe)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant