Skip to content

examples: sharpen facade-first external fixtures#843

Merged
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
examples/facade-first-rust-fixtures
May 19, 2026
Merged

examples: sharpen facade-first external fixtures#843
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
examples/facade-first-rust-fixtures

Conversation

@EffortlessSteven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • expand external example READMEs with SPEC-0019-style user job, dependency, import, positive path, negative path, and boundary sections
  • split the rust-test-fixtures example into a positive RSA/JWK facade path and a negative API-key near-miss parser path
  • reword the downstream CI audit example boundary away from scanner-evasion language
  • advance the usability-polish goal from facade examples to external library smoke

Boundaries

  • no release prep, version bump, tag, or publish
  • no new contract packs, badges, provider compatibility claims, production security claims, or broad facade redesign
  • no installed CLI execution of xtask or claim-ledger commands

Validation

  • cargo fmt --all -- --check
  • cargo test --manifest-path examples/external/rust-test-fixtures/Cargo.toml
  • cargo test -p xtask external_adoption_smoke
  • cargo +nightly xtask external-adoption-smoke --path .
  • cargo +nightly xtask docs-sync --check
  • cargo +nightly xtask typos
  • cargo +nightly xtask pr-lite
  • git diff --check
  • scanner-evasion wording search returned no matches in the edited examples and active goal

Note: the generated external example Cargo.lock was removed before final validation and is not committed.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@EffortlessSteven has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 7 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0348c6cc-7586-408e-93c8-3d81ab84b91c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82b8d08 and 8ec7a23.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .uselesskey/goals/active.toml
  • examples/external/downstream-ci-bundle-audit/README.md
  • examples/external/oidc-jwks-validation/README.md
  • examples/external/rust-test-fixtures/README.md
  • examples/external/rust-test-fixtures/src/lib.rs
  • examples/external/tls-chain-validation/README.md
  • examples/external/webhook-verifier/README.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch examples/facade-first-rust-fixtures

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven merged commit d7f5699 into main May 19, 2026
5 checks passed
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven deleted the examples/facade-first-rust-fixtures branch May 19, 2026 04:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant