Skip to content

docs(spec): define bundle product surface#835

Merged
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/bundle-product-surface-spec
May 18, 2026
Merged

docs(spec): define bundle product surface#835
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/bundle-product-surface-spec

Conversation

@EffortlessSteven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • add USELESSKEY-SPEC-0017-bundle-product-surface.md
  • define bundle manifest, artifact, lane, and receipt contracts before broad emitter expansion
  • name current and target receipt surfaces: materialization, audit-surface, bundle-verification, scanner-safety, and negative-coverage
  • index SPEC-0017 and advance the real-workflow goal to the bundle manifest/receipt implementation slice

User path

This clarifies the installed bundle product contract users rely on when they generate, verify, inspect, audit, and share bundle metadata in CI.

Boundary

Docs/spec only. No emitter changes, no new profile or contract pack, no release prep, no version bump, no provider compatibility claim, no production security claim, and no scanner-evasion language.

Proof

  • cargo +nightly xtask spec-check --strict
  • cargo +nightly xtask docs-sync --check
  • cargo +nightly xtask typos
  • git diff --check

Receipts

  • docs/specs/USELESSKEY-SPEC-0017-bundle-product-surface.md
  • docs/specs/README.md
  • plans/real-workflow-closure/implementation-plan.md
  • .uselesskey/goals/active.toml

Risk

No deterministic fixture identity changes. The main risk is overclaiming future receipts, so the spec explicitly marks target receipts as implementation work for the next PR.

Rollback

Revertable before bundle manifest/receipt implementation begins.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@EffortlessSteven has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 86287593-bf14-4bef-a365-825b22988719

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b6342b and 4ef64c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .uselesskey/goals/active.toml
  • docs/specs/README.md
  • docs/specs/USELESSKEY-SPEC-0017-bundle-product-surface.md
  • plans/real-workflow-closure/implementation-plan.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/bundle-product-surface-spec

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven merged commit 063a1bd into main May 18, 2026
5 checks passed
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven deleted the docs/bundle-product-surface-spec branch May 18, 2026 22:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant