Skip to content

feat(cli): improve audit-bundle failure diagnostics#799

Merged
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/audit-failure-diagnostics
May 18, 2026
Merged

feat(cli): improve audit-bundle failure diagnostics#799
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/audit-failure-diagnostics

Conversation

@EffortlessSteven

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Adds class-specific �udit-bundle diagnostics for CI and interactive failures.
  • Keeps stable JSON failure classes and the schema shape unchanged.
  • Preserves metadata-only audit output and adds regression coverage for actionable path_escape details plus diagnostic mapper mutation coverage.

Files added/changed

  • .uselesskey/goals/active.toml
  • crates/uselesskey-cli/src/main.rs
  • crates/uselesskey-cli/tests/cli.rs

Validation

  • cargo test -p uselesskey-cli --all-features bundle_audit_failure_diagnostics_are_class_specific
  • cargo test -p uselesskey-cli --all-features audit_bundle
  • cargo xtask mutants-pr --changed
  • cargo xtask no-blob
  • cargo +nightly xtask pr-lite
  • cargo fmt --all -- --check
  • git diff --check

Non-goals

  • No release prep, version bump, tag, or publish.
  • No new contract packs or badges.
  • No provider compatibility, production security, or scanner-evasion claims.
  • No raw fixture payload copying into audit diagnostics or receipts.

What this enables next

  • Downstream CI users get stable machine classes plus copyable remediation text before the installed CLI doctor slice.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@EffortlessSteven has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bfad6a20-6786-4d75-886b-1d8d08af9d19

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1440568 and 56fab13.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .uselesskey/goals/active.toml
  • crates/uselesskey-cli/src/main.rs
  • crates/uselesskey-cli/tests/cli.rs
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/audit-failure-diagnostics

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven force-pushed the feat/audit-failure-diagnostics branch from 17024e8 to 56fab13 Compare May 18, 2026 08:17
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven merged commit 6f13754 into main May 18, 2026
6 checks passed
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven deleted the feat/audit-failure-diagnostics branch May 18, 2026 08:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant