Skip to content

docs(spec): define external adoption smoke#766

Merged
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/external-adoption-smoke-spec
May 17, 2026
Merged

docs(spec): define external adoption smoke#766
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/external-adoption-smoke-spec

Conversation

@EffortlessSteven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Add USELESSKEY-SPEC-0013 for clean-project external adoption smoke.
  • Register the spec in the specs index and v0.10.0 external adoption plan.
  • Advance the active goal so external-adoption-smoke implementation is the next ready slice.

Files added/changed

  • .uselesskey/goals/active.toml
  • docs/specs/README.md
  • docs/specs/USELESSKEY-SPEC-0013-external-adoption-smoke.md
  • plans/v0.10.0-external-adoption/implementation-plan.md

Validation

  • cargo xtask spec-check --strict
  • cargo xtask docs-sync --check
  • cargo xtask typos
  • git diff --check

Non-goals

  • No external-adoption-smoke implementation yet.
  • No v0.10.0 release prep, version bump, tag, or publish.
  • No new contract packs, badges, shipper work, provider compatibility claims, production security claims, broad refactors, or dependency churn.

What this enables next

  • cargo xtask external-adoption-smoke --path . with Markdown/JSON receipts under target/external-adoption-smoke/.
  • Clean-project proof for installed-style CLI commands and documented dependency snippets.
  • Later docs/examples work that can target a concrete smoke contract.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@EffortlessSteven has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 47 minutes and 7 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ddfd266d-9cfa-4632-a074-b8b6c1f53a0f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a286cf1 and 258d5cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .uselesskey/goals/active.toml
  • docs/specs/README.md
  • docs/specs/USELESSKEY-SPEC-0013-external-adoption-smoke.md
  • plans/v0.10.0-external-adoption/implementation-plan.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/external-adoption-smoke-spec

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven merged commit e6c5229 into main May 17, 2026
5 checks passed
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven deleted the docs/external-adoption-smoke-spec branch May 17, 2026 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant