docs: tighten hand-maintained README prose#294
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe README is restructured to clarify Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on a comprehensive cleanup and refinement of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly improves the clarity and structure of the README.md file. The new introduction, the "Choose the smallest feature set" section, and the refined explanations for token fixtures and design principles make the documentation much more accessible and user-friendly. The changes effectively tighten the prose and guide users better. I have one minor suggestion regarding stylistic consistency for the headings.
| <!-- docs-sync:feature-matrix-adapters-end --> | ||
|
|
||
| ## Why This Crate? | ||
| ## Why this crate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This change to sentence case is consistent with other new headings in this PR (e.g., ## Why this exists). However, many other headings in the document still use Title Case (e.g., ## Quick Start, ## Feature Flags, ## Ecosystem). To improve overall consistency, consider changing all headings to use the same style, preferably sentence case to align with the recent changes.
For example:
## Quick start## Feature flags## Ecosystem## Community## Stability and versioning## License
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 58: Update the output-shapes list entry that currently reads "Certificate
leafs and chains" to use correct pluralization: replace "leafs" with "leaves" so
the phrase becomes "Certificate leaves and chains"; locate the exact string
"Certificate leafs and chains" in the README output-shapes section and update it
accordingly.
e536ce1 to
b62ac06
Compare
Hand-maintained prose cleanup only. The generated README sections (dependency snippets, runnable examples, workspace/feature matrices) remain unchanged and continue to be source-of-truth through docs-sync.