You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

Droid finished @EffortlessSteven's task —— View job

Droid review completed.

Validation result: No candidate comments were provided for validation.

Review outcome: approved

Summary: The PR is a well-structured goal switch and implementation plan. active.toml is clean with a single complete work_item, all document references are valid, format/policy checks pass, and the plan correctly sequences six PRs with proper blocking dependencies. No actionable findings.

Inspected surfaces:

• .shipper-meta/goals/active.toml — status, work_item structure, proposal/spec/plan/issue references, proof commands
• plans/reconcile/implementation-plan.md — PR sequence, blocking dependencies, acceptance criteria, rollback paths

Why no comments:

• No source code or runtime behavior changes in this PR
• Only documentation and goal metadata changes
• All referenced documents exist and are syntactically valid
• Proof commands reference real xtask entry points

Residual risk: None — this is a metadata-only PR.

Validation signal:
Observed: active.toml TOML parses successfully; implementation-plan.md is syntactically valid
Reported: All document paths reference existing files
Not verified: Actual execution of proof commands (advisory validation steps)