You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

Droid finished @EffortlessSteven's task —— View job

Droid review complete. No actionable findings.

Inspected surfaces:

• .github/workflows/ci.yml :: new check-doc-contracts advisory step placement and arguments
• PR description :: stated goal and validation commands

Checks performed:

• Advisory mode always returns mode_fails = false (advisory never blocks)
• Step correctly placed before unified policy-report step
• Follows established advisory pattern (blocking-allowlist steps already in job)

Why no comments:

• No candidates were emitted (empty comments array in candidates file)
• Diff is a pure CI workflow addition with no source code changes
• Advisory mode is designed to never gate merges; no correctness or safety issue

Residual risk:

• doc-contracts checker behavior not independently verified (not in scope for this PR)

Validation signal:
Observed: diff adds single step with correct --mode advisory flag
Reported: PR description validation commands include advisory check
Not verified: actual xtask check-doc-contracts exit behavior