Allow None value in feature_scaling #775
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
@tamarl08 yes I think we should. Not only that |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #775 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.40% 95.40%
=======================================
Files 29 29
Lines 3676 3676
=======================================
Hits 3507 3507
Misses 169 169 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
damien2012eng
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If
Noneis given in the configuration file, it is passed as the string "None". This change converts it to "none" which is the default value.I didn't change anything in the documentation - @desilinguist do you
Nonethis should be explicitly mentioned as an acceptable option?