Skip to content

fix: use absolute GitHub URLs in benchmarks docs#139

Merged
SantiagoDePolonia merged 4 commits intomainfrom
feat/benchmark-reproduction
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

fix: use absolute GitHub URLs in benchmarks docs#139
SantiagoDePolonia merged 4 commits intomainfrom
feat/benchmark-reproduction

Conversation

@SantiagoDePolonia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Replace relative ./benchmark-tools/ links with absolute GitHub URLs (https://github.com/ENTERPILOT/GOModel/blob/main/docs/about/benchmark-tools/...) so they resolve correctly on the Mintlify docs site
  • Fix repository URL casing in the clone command (enterpilot/gomodelENTERPILOT/GOModel)

Test plan

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

SantiagoDePolonia and others added 4 commits March 12, 2026 20:19
Add the benchmark comparison scripts (compare.sh, bench CLI source,
chart generator) to docs/about/benchmark-tools/ so anyone can reproduce
the GoModel vs LiteLLM benchmark. Update the benchmarks.mdx Mintlify
page with a "Reproduce it yourself" section including prerequisites,
quick start, and tuning instructions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Relative links (./benchmark-tools/) resolve within Mintlify instead of
pointing to the actual source files on GitHub. Replace with absolute
GitHub URLs and fix repository URL casing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@SantiagoDePolonia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ea01ae3c-ee87-4121-b911-1bc678c00049

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16dfece and 2e6a9e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/about/benchmarks.mdx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/benchmark-reproduction
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@SantiagoDePolonia SantiagoDePolonia merged commit 6a3b490 into main Mar 12, 2026
13 checks passed
@SantiagoDePolonia SantiagoDePolonia deleted the feat/benchmark-reproduction branch March 22, 2026 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant