Skip to content

Conversation

@EdwardChaplinArchilizer
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

This PR address DYN-6758 & DYN-6759.

It addresses Inconsistency between menu name given in the description and the one in Library (DYN-6758)

Before:
image

After:
image

It also addresses Inconsistency between name of option given in the note (Math sample) and the one in the menu (DYN-6759)

Before:
image
image

After:
image
image

Declarations

Check these if you believe they are true

  • The codebase is in a better state after this PR
  • Is documented according to the standards
  • The level of testing this PR includes is appropriate
  • User facing strings, if any, are extracted into *.resx files
  • All tests pass using the self-service CI.
  • Snapshot of UI changes, if any.
  • Changes to the API follow Semantic Versioning and are documented in the API Changes document.
  • This PR modifies some build requirements and the readme is updated
  • This PR contains no files larger than 50 MB

Release Notes

Updating the Core_Math.dyn sample file. Specifically updating Unclear note of "Code Block" node in Strings sample and Unclear note of "Code Block" node in Code Blocks sample.

Reviewers

@dnenov
@achintyabhat
@QilongTang

Informed
@Amoursol

… the one in Library

Updating CORE: Inconsistency between name of option given in the note (Math sample) and the one in the menu
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See the ticket for this pull request: https://jira.autodesk.com/browse/DYN-6758

@QilongTang QilongTang added this to the 3.5 milestone Mar 5, 2025
@QilongTang
Copy link
Contributor

QilongTang commented Mar 5, 2025

@avidit Fine to merge with smoke test failure? Saw the other PR have the check passed, it's worth chasing

"Zoom": 0.28542192141810496
"X": 51.34875002226386,
"Y": 800.7886260085731,
"Zoom": 0.19068736946261172
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if it's the change of view port making the smoke tests fail, @EdwardChaplinArchilizer maybe revert the changes here. FYI: @reddyashish @zeusongit

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the discussion on slack, I think @sm6srw and @avidit are looking into it.

@avidit
Copy link
Contributor

avidit commented Mar 5, 2025

@avidit Fine to merge with smoke test failure? Saw the other PR have the check passed, it's worth chasing

I am getting sporadic build failures. I am trying to find the cause. I will rerun the job just in case.

@QilongTang QilongTang merged commit 2ee5e3f into DynamoDS:master Mar 18, 2025
23 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants