Skip to content

Conversation

@tpoliaw
Copy link
Contributor

@tpoliaw tpoliaw commented May 29, 2025

Accepted all changes other than Python 3.13 as it is not yet supported
by dependencies (scanspec, aioca etc)

See #1014

Accepted all changes other than Python 3.13 as it is not yet supported
by dependencies (scanspec, aioca etc)
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.82%. Comparing base (e7dae73) to head (d15cc37).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1013      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.86%   94.82%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        2493     2493              
==========================================
- Hits         2365     2364       -1     
- Misses        128      129       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tpoliaw tpoliaw changed the title Update copier template chore: Update copier template May 29, 2025
author_email: callum.forrester@diamond.ac.uk
author_name: Callum Forrester
component_lifecycle: production
component_owner: user:vid18871
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
component_owner: user:vid18871
component_owner: group:default/core-data-acquisition

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be changed but maybe in a separate PR? Doesn't really seem related to updating the template.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can a ticket be created for this ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably but it's small enough that it could be a direct-to-PR change

@ZohebShaikh ZohebShaikh self-requested a review May 29, 2025 12:54
---

Describe the bug, including a clear and concise description of the expected behavior, the actual behavior and the context in which you encountered it (ideally include details of your environment).
Describe the bug, including a clear and concise description of the expected behaviour, the actual behavior and the context in which you encountered it (ideally include details of your environment).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully we don't seesaw back and forth on americanisms

Copy link
Contributor

@DiamondJoseph DiamondJoseph left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll make an issue for support 3.13

#1014

@tpoliaw tpoliaw merged commit 1c1bbf7 into main May 29, 2025
32 of 34 checks passed
@tpoliaw tpoliaw deleted the copier-update branch May 29, 2025 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants