Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lucperkins has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughModifies Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
1-3: Restructure overlapping version ranges to follow pnpm best practices.pnpm documentation explicitly advises to "avoid overlapping version ranges" and recommends explicitly excluding sub-ranges from broader ranges when specialization is needed. The current configuration violates this: both
vite@>=7.1.0 <=7.1.10andvite@>=7.1.0 <=7.1.4match versions 7.1.0–7.1.4, creating ambiguity.The intent is clear: vite >=7.1.0 and <7.1.11 contains CVE-2025-62522 (fixed in 7.1.11), and earlier 7.1.x releases contain additional issues fixed in 7.1.5. However, line 3 becomes dead code because line 2 already forces >=7.1.11 (which exceeds the 7.1.5 target in line 3).
Restructure to use non-overlapping ranges:
overrides: vite@>=7.1.5 <=7.1.10: '>=7.1.11' vite@>=7.1.0 <=7.1.4: '>=7.1.5'This ensures each range is mutually exclusive and both vulnerability fixes apply correctly.
Fixes a Dependabot issue
Summary by CodeRabbit