-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.5k
Update useRef types to reflect normal usage #64855
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
ericanderson
wants to merge
1
commit into
DefinitelyTyped:master
from
ericanderson:eanderson/fix-react-types
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This wording doesn't really add value. There was a rationale why we did this. It's like saying
ReadonlyArray<SomeArray>"was always wrong". Just because something works in JavaScript, doesn't mean it's correct.I don't think we should deprecate this. Doesn't it make more sense to drop MutableRefObject in the future instead and let
RefObjectbe the mutable one?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Originally, MutableRefs meant user-managed while readonly-refs meant react-managed. See https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/pull/64772/files#r1148507326
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reviewed the history prior to making the recommendation. However there isn't really a way to know if the intended use is user managed vs react-managed, which is unfortunate.
Changing RefObject to be representable with MutableRefObject allows for deprecation. The reverse isn't possible.
I'm saying its "wrong" because really you can change it as you see fit and applying magic typing to try to signify if something is readonly or not is just confusing. I'm saying its "wrong" because we created a weird mechanism in the types that are inconsistent with react itself and have been since day one.
Also, saying the ref is 'readonly' when you pass it to something that clearly modifies the value, also breaks most of the ways that readonly is used, which is that it lets you know that the thing you are giving it to doesn't mutate it. To your example of a ReadonlyArray, if an API had a
doFoo()that returned{foo: ReadonlyArray<T>}then I would assume that the inner array would never change out from under me. But in the analogy, you're allowing it to change by react.