Inspecting the JavaScript source for this package found some properties that are not in the .d.ts files.
The check for missing properties isn't always right, so take this list as advice, not a requirement.

yeoman-environment (unpkg)

was missing the following properties:

1. UNKNOWN_NAMESPACE
2. UNKNOWN_RESOLVED
3. queues
4. lookups
5. repository

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 19e4a1a

@eps1lon Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

• react-draft-wysiwyg — on npm, on unpkg

Code Reviews

Because you edited one package and there were no type definition changes, I can help you merge this PR once someone else signs off on it.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• ✅ Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners or DT maintainers

All of the items on the list are green. To merge, you need to post a comment including the string "Ready to merge" to bring in your changes.

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 58958,
  "author": "eps1lon",
  "headCommitOid": "19e4a1a4f717bc2db2c93034f6c9e1d303c3318f",
  "mergeBaseOid": "322b09e7e97422bbeb564159b9ffaafdd1c1827f",
  "lastPushDate": "2022-02-24T18:17:50.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2022-03-16T07:13:33.000Z",
  "mergeOfferDate": "2022-03-15T20:27:29.000Z",
  "mergeRequestDate": "2022-03-16T07:13:33.000Z",
  "mergeRequestUser": "eps1lon",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Popular",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "react-draft-wysiwyg",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/react-draft-wysiwyg/test/basic-tests.tsx",
          "kind": "test"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "imechZhangLY",
        "brunoMaurice",
        "ldanet",
        "MunifTanjim",
        "n-zeplo"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Popular"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [
    {
      "type": "approved",
      "reviewer": "peterblazejewicz",
      "date": "2022-03-15T20:26:49.000Z",
      "isMaintainer": true
    }
  ],
  "mainBotCommentID": 1050147616,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

🔔 @imechZhangLY @brunoMaurice @ldanet @MunifTanjim @n-zeplo — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

Re-ping @imechZhangLY, @brunoMaurice, @ldanet, @MunifTanjim, @n-zeplo:

This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.

Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!

It has been more than two weeks and this PR still has no reviews.

I'll bump it to the DT maintainer queue. Thank you for your patience, @eps1lon.

(Ping @imechZhangLY, @brunoMaurice, @ldanet, @MunifTanjim, @n-zeplo.)

Ready to merge

@peterblazejewicz Oh and just to elaborate since this is the second review I'm not incorporating: in any other repo I wouldn't have a problem doing these since a particular style doesn't concern me much. But PRs here take weeks to get a review. I was afraid that a push would prolong this another 3 weeks and this would interrupt other scheduled work.

But PRs here take weeks to get a review. I was afraid that a push would prolong this another 3 weeks

please feel free to reference me directly for that kind of changes you're doing, thx!