Skip to content

Conversation

@peterblazejewicz
Copy link
Member

@peterblazejewicz peterblazejewicz commented May 27, 2021

AFAIK: the intent was to use Buffer (from Node), not custom Buffer (for
browser). PG is for Node, not for browser and 3rd party Buffer is not
whitelisted, so it impacted (best guess) recent failing CI tests.

Thanks!

see: #52775
/cc @SimonSchick

  • Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
  • Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
  • Run npm test <package to test>.

The intent was to use Buffer (from Node), not custom Buffer (for
browser). PG is for Node, not for browser and 3rd party Buffer is not
whitelisted, so it impacted (best guess) recent failing CI tests.

Thanks!

see: DefinitelyTyped#52775
/cc @SimonSchick
@peterblazejewicz peterblazejewicz mentioned this pull request May 27, 2021
8 tasks
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

typescript-bot commented May 27, 2021

@peterblazejewicz Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

Code Reviews

Because you edited one package and updated the tests (👏), I can help you merge this PR once someone else signs off on it.

You can test the changes in this PR in the Playground.

Status

  • ✅ No merge conflicts
  • ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
  • ✅ Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners, DT maintainers or others

All of the items on the list are green. To merge, you need to post a comment including the string "Ready to merge" to bring in your changes.


Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR
{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 53432,
  "author": "peterblazejewicz",
  "headCommitOid": "cb4819d3ecf5d075ed0f4747cf37db8dcf09aa48",
  "lastPushDate": "2021-05-27T06:53:14.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2021-05-27T14:55:00.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "pg-large-object",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/pg-large-object/index.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/pg-large-object/pg-large-object-tests.ts",
          "kind": "test"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "mateuszkrupa"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [
    {
      "type": "approved",
      "reviewer": "SimonSchick",
      "date": "2021-05-27T14:55:00.000Z",
      "isMaintainer": false
    }
  ],
  "mainBotCommentID": 849380648,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🔔 @mateuszkrupa — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

@peterblazejewicz peterblazejewicz mentioned this pull request May 27, 2021
8 tasks
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Other Approved This PR was reviewed and signed-off by a community member. Self Merge This PR can now be self-merged by the PR author or an owner labels May 27, 2021
@peterblazejewicz peterblazejewicz merged commit 75a0376 into DefinitelyTyped:master May 27, 2021
@peterblazejewicz peterblazejewicz deleted the fix/pg-large-object branch May 27, 2021 16:10
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

I just published @types/pg-large-object@2.0.3 to npm.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Other Approved This PR was reviewed and signed-off by a community member. Self Merge This PR can now be self-merged by the PR author or an owner

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants