Skip to content

[K9VULN-9728] Only use production rules for CI checks#797

Merged
jasonforal merged 1 commit intomainfrom
jason.foral/K9VULN-9728
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[K9VULN-9728] Only use production rules for CI checks#797
jasonforal merged 1 commit intomainfrom
jason.foral/K9VULN-9728

Conversation

@jasonforal
Copy link
Collaborator

What problem are you trying to solve?

Our CI pipeline currently tests rules from staging, which means important tasks like releasing a new analyzer version depend on the state of the staging environment. Because it's acceptable for staging to have half-implemented, mid-edit, or otherwise broken rules, this creates an undesirable coupling.

What is your solution?

Don't run CI against staging rules

Alternatives considered

What the reviewer should know

@jasonforal jasonforal requested a review from a team as a code owner November 17, 2025 23:51
@jasonforal jasonforal merged commit 754a48a into main Nov 18, 2025
79 checks passed
@jasonforal jasonforal deleted the jason.foral/K9VULN-9728 branch November 18, 2025 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants