Skip to content

[Backport 7.76.x] Push to bazel* caches from the main branch only#46179

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into7.76.xfrom
backport-46151-to-7.76.x
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

[Backport 7.76.x] Push to bazel* caches from the main branch only#46179
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into7.76.xfrom
backport-46151-to-7.76.x

Conversation

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Backport 0463d57 from #46151.


What does this PR do?

Configure GitLab bazel* caches on ephemeral runners to use a pull-only policy by default, and pull-push only when running on the main branch.

This restriction applies only to GitLab caches - at this stage, the bazel remote cache remains indeed shared across all branches.

Motivation

  1. avoid cache pollution from feature and release branches while allowing main to populate the cache in a progressive manner,
  2. because the GitLab cache is uploaded to a shared S3 bucket, restricting uploads to main reduces S3 write contention and costs incurred by parallel cache overwrites.

Because the GitLab cache is shared across pipelines, allowing feature or release branches to push artifacts pollutes the cache with experimental entries from feature branches and meanwhile-evicted entries from oldest release branches.

Additional Notes

Release branches and feature branches behind main may fetch older dependencies, whereas feature branches ahead of main may fetch newer dependencies, but:

  • they'll still benefit from the bazel remote cache,
  • they'll no longer incur the overhead of uploading GitLab caches.

… does this PR do? Configure GitLab `bazel*` caches on ephemeral runners to use a `pull`-only policy by default, and `pull-push` only when running on the `main` branch.

This restriction applies only to **GitLab** caches - at this stage, the `bazel` **remote** cache remains indeed shared across all branches.

### Motivation
1. avoid cache pollution from feature and release branches while allowing `main` to populate the cache in a _progressive_ manner,
2. because the GitLab cache is uploaded to a shared S3 bucket, restricting uploads to `main` reduces S3 write contention and costs incurred by parallel cache overwrites.

Because the GitLab cache is shared across pipelines, allowing feature or release branches to push artifacts pollutes the cache with _experimental_ entries from feature branches and _meanwhile-evicted_ entries from oldest release branches.

### Additional Notes
Release branches and feature branches _behind_ `main` may fetch _older_ dependencies, whereas feature branches _ahead_ of `main` may fetch _newer_ dependencies, but:
- they'll still benefit from the `bazel` remote cache,
- they'll no longer incur the overhead of uploading GitLab caches.

Co-authored-by: regis.desgroppes <regis.desgroppes@datadoghq.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0463d57)

___

Co-authored-by: Régis Desgroppes <rdesgroppes@gmail.com>
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added backport bot changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed labels Feb 10, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2026 11:04
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Feb 10, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2026 11:04
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-build team/agent-devx labels Feb 10, 2026
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Gitlab CI Configuration Changes

⚠️ Diff too large to display on Github.

Changes Summary

Removed Modified Added Renamed
1 128 0 0

ℹ️ Diff available in the job log.

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 188e66f
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard

31 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 752.558 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 712.540 MiB
agent_heroku_amd64 326.020 MiB
agent_msi 662.356 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 752.541 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 712.524 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 731.344 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 693.788 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 752.541 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 712.524 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 731.344 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 693.788 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 814.677 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 818.067 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1005.588 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 997.760 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 181.187 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 196.997 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.135 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.689 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 38.859 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.191 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 30.074 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.219 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 30.074 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 30.074 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 43.041 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 40.143 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 40.713 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 43.042 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 43.042 MiB
On-wire sizes (compressed)
Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 -23.66 KiB (0.01% reduction) 183.910 → 183.886 → 184.810
agent_deb_amd64_fips +18.5 KiB (0.01% increase) 176.307 → 176.325 → 177.560
agent_heroku_amd64 -12.47 KiB (0.01% reduction) 87.127 → 87.115 → 88.450
agent_msi -20.0 KiB (0.01% reduction) 143.148 → 143.129 → 143.300
agent_rpm_amd64 -37.38 KiB (0.02% reduction) 186.806 → 186.770 → 188.160
agent_rpm_amd64_fips +34.29 KiB (0.02% increase) 177.936 → 177.970 → 178.900
agent_rpm_arm64 -33.34 KiB (0.02% reduction) 168.564 → 168.531 → 169.930
agent_rpm_arm64_fips -20.45 KiB (0.01% reduction) 161.632 → 161.612 → 163.120
agent_suse_amd64 -37.38 KiB (0.02% reduction) 186.806 → 186.770 → 188.160
agent_suse_amd64_fips +34.29 KiB (0.02% increase) 177.936 → 177.970 → 178.900
agent_suse_arm64 -33.34 KiB (0.02% reduction) 168.564 → 168.531 → 169.930
agent_suse_arm64_fips -20.45 KiB (0.01% reduction) 161.632 → 161.612 → 163.120
docker_agent_amd64 neutral 276.539 MiB → 277.400
docker_agent_arm64 neutral 263.988 MiB → 266.040
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 -3.32 KiB (0.00% reduction) 345.198 → 345.194 → 346.020
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 -2.88 KiB (0.00% reduction) 328.625 → 328.622 → 330.660
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 neutral 63.995 MiB → 64.510
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 neutral 60.277 MiB → 61.170
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 neutral 2.994 MiB → 3.330
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 neutral 2.726 MiB → 3.090
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 neutral 15.037 MiB → 15.820
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 neutral 14.366 MiB → 14.830
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 neutral 7.949 MiB → 8.790
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 neutral 6.829 MiB → 7.710
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 neutral 7.962 MiB → 8.800
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 neutral 7.962 MiB → 8.800
iot_agent_deb_amd64 neutral 11.292 MiB → 12.040
iot_agent_deb_arm64 neutral 9.652 MiB → 10.450
iot_agent_deb_armhf +2.93 KiB (0.03% increase) 9.848 → 9.851 → 10.620
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 neutral 11.310 MiB → 12.060
iot_agent_suse_amd64 neutral 11.310 MiB → 12.060

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 75babe40-9707-4ee1-9dec-a7c1f5f6d3cb

Baseline: 188e66f
Comparison: 3570a08
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.06 [-2.02, +4.15] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +1.50 [+1.28, +1.73] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.06 [-2.02, +4.15] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization +0.65 [+0.58, +0.72] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization +0.39 [+0.23, +0.56] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization +0.35 [+0.13, +0.56] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.34 [+0.29, +0.39] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.32 [+0.27, +0.37] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization +0.22 [+0.16, +0.29] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.18 [+0.14, +0.22] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +0.14 [+0.05, +0.23] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.09 [-0.30, +0.47] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization +0.05 [-0.18, +0.29] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.03, +0.05] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.42, +0.44] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.09, +0.11] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization -0.01 [-0.24, +0.22] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.12, +0.09] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput -0.02 [-0.14, +0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.47, +0.44] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.21 [-0.25, -0.17] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization -0.55 [-0.70, -0.39] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.70 [-2.18, +0.79] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -3.09 [-3.19, -2.99] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@avonengel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link
Copy Markdown

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Feb 11, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-02-11 12:49:58 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-02-11 12:50:04 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in 7.76.x is approximately 48m (p90).


2026-02-11 13:27:29 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot merged commit d128b33 into 7.76.x Feb 11, 2026
447 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot deleted the backport-46151-to-7.76.x branch February 11, 2026 13:27
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.76.0 milestone Feb 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport bot changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-build team/agent-devx

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant