Conversation
Signed-off-by: Dargon789 <64915515+Dargon789@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Dargon789 <64915515+Dargon789@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewer's GuideAdds a SECURITY.md file documenting supported versions for security updates and how to report vulnerabilities to the Next.js team via GitHub’s private vulnerability reporting feature. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Summary of ChangesHello @Dargon789, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a SECURITY.md file to define the project's security policy. This is a valuable addition. I have provided a couple of suggestions to improve the document's clarity. My feedback includes removing some instructional template text and clarifying the supported versions table, which currently presents a potentially confusing support policy.
I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.
SECURITY.md (5-6)
This instructional text appears to be from a template and should be removed to keep the document clean and professional.
SECURITY.md (10-12)
The version support policy outlined here could be confusing for users. It's unconventional to support version 5.1.x and the older 4.0.x while not supporting the intermediate 5.0.x. If this is intentional, it would be beneficial to add a note explaining the rationale to avoid confusion. Otherwise, this might be a typo.
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation: