Conversation
Signed-off-by: Dargon789 <64915515+Dargon789@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewer's GuideAdds a new SECURITY.md file outlining the project’s security policy template, including supported versions and guidelines for reporting vulnerabilities. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Summary of ChangesHello @Dargon789, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request establishes a formal security policy for the project by adding a Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've found 1 issue, and left some high level feedback:
- The SECURITY.md content still uses template placeholder text (e.g., "Use this section to tell people..."); consider replacing these with concrete instructions specific to this project’s security process and communication channels.
- The supported versions table lists specific versions (5.1.x, 5.0.x, 4.0.x, etc.) that don’t appear to match this repository’s actual release scheme; aligning this table with real maintained versions and how they’re determined would make the policy actionable.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The SECURITY.md content still uses template placeholder text (e.g., "Use this section to tell people..."); consider replacing these with concrete instructions specific to this project’s security process and communication channels.
- The supported versions table lists specific versions (5.1.x, 5.0.x, 4.0.x, etc.) that don’t appear to match this repository’s actual release scheme; aligning this table with real maintained versions and how they’re determined would make the policy actionable.
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `SECURITY.md:5-14` </location>
<code_context>
+
+## Supported Versions
+
+Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are
+currently being supported with security updates.
+
+| Version | Supported |
+| ------- | ------------------ |
+| 5.1.x | :white_check_mark: |
+| 5.0.x | :x: |
+| 4.0.x | :white_check_mark: |
+| < 4.0 | :x: |
+
+## Reporting a Vulnerability
+
+Use this section to tell people how to report a vulnerability.
+
+Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a
+reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or
+declined, etc.
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**🚨 suggestion (security):** Replace template placeholder text with concrete project-specific security policy details
This still contains the default template text (e.g., “Use this section to tell people…”). For a published SECURITY.md, please replace these instructions with your actual supported-version policy and a specific vulnerability reporting process (contact methods, response expectations, triage flow, etc.).
Suggested implementation:
```
## Supported Versions
The following table lists which versions of this project currently receive
security updates. Only actively supported versions will receive fixes for
security vulnerabilities.
| Version | Supported | Notes |
| ------- | ------------------ | ----------------------------------------|
| 5.1.x | :white_check_mark: | Active development and security fixes |
| 5.0.x | :x: | No longer supported |
| 4.0.x | :white_check_mark: | Security fixes only (no new features) |
| < 4.0 | :x: | End of life |
We strongly recommend running the latest supported minor version to ensure you
receive timely security updates.
```
```
## Reporting a Vulnerability
If you believe you have found a security vulnerability in this project, please
contact the maintainers directly and do **not** open a public issue.
### How to report
- Email: security@project.org
- Subject line: `SECURITY: <short description>`
- Please include:
- A detailed description of the issue
- Steps to reproduce (proof-of-concept if possible)
- The affected version(s)
- Any relevant logs, configuration snippets, or screenshots
### Our process
1. **Acknowledgement**
We will acknowledge receipt of your report within **3 business days**.
2. **Triage and assessment**
We will investigate the issue, determine its impact, and assign a severity.
We may contact you for additional information during this phase.
3. **Remediation**
- We will work on a fix and prepare a new release for supported versions.
- For high and critical severity issues, we aim to release a fix within
**14 days** of confirmation, where feasible.
4. **Disclosure**
- Once a fix is available, we will publish release notes describing the
issue and the remediation steps.
- We will credit you as the reporter in the release notes, if you wish.
Please make a good-faith effort to avoid privacy violations, data destruction,
or service disruption while testing, and do not publicly disclose details of
the vulnerability until we have released a fix.
```
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a SECURITY.md file, which is a great step for improving project security. However, the file currently contains placeholder content from a generic template. I've left specific comments on how to populate the 'Supported Versions' and 'Reporting a Vulnerability' sections with information specific to Next.js. Filling out this policy is crucial to provide clear guidance to users and security researchers.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Dargon789 <64915515+Dargon789@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation: