-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
fix(timeout-type-memo): update nix dependency proper way #4049
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Pull reviewers statsStats of the last 30 days for composable:
|
# run Composable node
nix run "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4049/merge" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed# run local Picasso DevNet (for CosmWasm development)
nix run "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4049/merge#devnet-picasso" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed # CosmWasm on Substrate CLI tool
nix run "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4049/merge#ccw" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed # run cross chain devnet with Dotsama and Cosmos nodes
nix run "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4049/merge#devnet-xc-fresh" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed
# or same with docker
nix build "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4049/merge#devnet-xc-image" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed \
&& docker load --input result && docker run -it --entrypoint bash devnet-xc:latest -c /bin/devnet-xc-fresh |
|
test locally |
kkast
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
waiting for local testing
|
@RustNinja may you elaborate on on how check was concluded that regression did not happen? |
We did the regression of new functionality and this changes should go to production. |
kkast
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tested


Required for merge:
pr-workflow-check / draft-release-checkis ✅ successMakes review faster:
misclabel if it should not be in release notesReviewers@) or used other form of notification of one person who I think can handle best review of this PR