Skip to content

Do not hold a storage in storage snapshot#95396

Merged
azat merged 4 commits into
ClickHouse:masterfrom
azat:storage-snapshot-no-storage
Jan 29, 2026
Merged

Do not hold a storage in storage snapshot#95396
azat merged 4 commits into
ClickHouse:masterfrom
azat:storage-snapshot-no-storage

Conversation

@azat

@azat azat commented Jan 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The storage should not outlive the execution after #92118, since it is hold in QueryPipeline.

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Not for changelog (changelog entry is not required)

@azat azat requested a review from amosbird January 28, 2026 13:41
@clickhouse-gh

clickhouse-gh Bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Workflow [PR], commit [53a1f41]

Summary:

job_name test_name status info comment
AST fuzzer (amd_ubsan) failure
Logical error: Cannot convert nested result of function A with type B to the expected result type C: D (STID: 4827-671c) FAIL cidb, issue

@clickhouse-gh clickhouse-gh Bot added the pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog label Jan 28, 2026
@azat

This comment was marked as outdated.

@azat azat marked this pull request as draft January 28, 2026 17:26
@azat azat force-pushed the storage-snapshot-no-storage branch 2 times, most recently from 579f8e5 to ca449c0 Compare January 28, 2026 20:30
@azat azat marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2026 20:43
@Avogar Avogar self-assigned this Jan 29, 2026
@azat azat force-pushed the storage-snapshot-no-storage branch from ca449c0 to 53a1f41 Compare January 29, 2026 15:47
@azat

azat commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Looks good, I hope I fixed all problems

@azat azat added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 29, 2026
Merged via the queue into ClickHouse:master with commit fff3e97 Jan 29, 2026
132 of 134 checks passed
@azat azat deleted the storage-snapshot-no-storage branch January 29, 2026 19:19
@robot-ch-test-poll4 robot-ch-test-poll4 added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label Jan 29, 2026
@alexey-milovidov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@azat, should we backport to 26.1?

@azat

azat commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Let's not to, since it should not harm in general, plus maybe there are some places left that was relying on this (hope not)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants